dor_id: 23949

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: El sistema de arbitraje es ciego; por pares anónimos, externos.

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), SCOPUS, Web Of Science (WoS)

561.#.#.u: http://www.ib.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Biología y Química

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/1273/1118

100.1.#.a: Rico Arce, María de Lourdes

524.#.#.a: Rico Arce, María de Lourdes. (2012). Who amends the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the participation that the Latin American Herbaria have and how it can be increased?. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 83, núm. 4, 2012: diciembre. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/23949

245.1.0.a: Who amends the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the participation that the Latin American Herbaria have and how it can be increased?

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Biología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2012

264.#.1.c: 2012-07-01

653.#.#.a: International Code; Nimenclature; Acacia

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2012-07-01, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de falvarez@ib.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/1273

001.#.#.#: oai:ojs.132.248.13.2:article/1273

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Changes to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature are decided upon every 6 years at Nomenclature Sections that are part of International Botanical Congresses (IBC). How the Code is amended? The “decision” to conserve the name Acacia with a new type from Australia, one of the most heated and polarized debates over botanical nomenclature, casting doubt over the legitimacy of the procedure and botanical decision-making is taken as example.Despite a website www.acaciavote.com, for which by July 2011, the votes were: 7 659 opposing the re-typification of Acacia, including 101 votes from people in Australia, and only 110 accepting the re-typification, did not make any affect to influence to amend the Code? Only delegates present at the Nomenclature Section and the number of active institutional votes that they carry can decide the changes to the Code; from 878 distributed to registered herbaria only396 of these were taken to Melbourne. Australia and the United States were the countries with the largest number of votes. There is little participation of Latin American Countries, in general of developing countries, how this can beincreased and effective throughout herbaria institutional votes? In this note the steps to follow up are given.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 83, núm. 4 (2012): diciembre

773.1.#.o: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

046.#.#.j: 2021-02-09 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: 2007-8706; 1870-3453

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

780.1.2.t: Anales del Instituto de Biología serie Botánica y Anales del Instituto de Biología serie Zoología

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Biología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/ib.20078706e.2012.4.1273

harvesting_date: 2020-09-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_modification_date: 2019-10-18 17:41:50.0

245.1.0.b: ¿Quién modifica el Código Internacional de Nomenclatura para algas, hongos y plantas, que participación tienen los herbarios latinoamericanos y como puede ésta incrementarse?

last_modified: 2021-02-16 17:50:00.000

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-61341252b429de35cd1e1ad2aad92878

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Who amends the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the participation that the Latin American Herbaria have and how it can be increased?

Rico Arce, María de Lourdes

Instituto de Biología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Rico Arce, María de Lourdes. (2012). Who amends the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the participation that the Latin American Herbaria have and how it can be increased?. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 83, núm. 4, 2012: diciembre. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/23949

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Rico Arce, María de Lourdes
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Biología y Química
Título
Who amends the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants, the participation that the Latin American Herbaria have and how it can be increased?
Fecha
2012-07-01
Resumen
Changes to the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature are decided upon every 6 years at Nomenclature Sections that are part of International Botanical Congresses (IBC). How the Code is amended? The “decision” to conserve the name Acacia with a new type from Australia, one of the most heated and polarized debates over botanical nomenclature, casting doubt over the legitimacy of the procedure and botanical decision-making is taken as example.Despite a website www.acaciavote.com, for which by July 2011, the votes were: 7 659 opposing the re-typification of Acacia, including 101 votes from people in Australia, and only 110 accepting the re-typification, did not make any affect to influence to amend the Code? Only delegates present at the Nomenclature Section and the number of active institutional votes that they carry can decide the changes to the Code; from 878 distributed to registered herbaria only396 of these were taken to Melbourne. Australia and the United States were the countries with the largest number of votes. There is little participation of Latin American Countries, in general of developing countries, how this can beincreased and effective throughout herbaria institutional votes? In this note the steps to follow up are given.
Tema
International Code; Nimenclature; Acacia
Idioma
eng
ISSN
2007-8706; 1870-3453

Enlaces