dor_id: 4110241

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a JART se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), SCOPUS, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Periódica, Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (Redalyc), Google Académico

561.#.#.u: https://www.icat.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Ingenierías

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://jart.icat.unam.mx/index.php/jart

351.#.#.b: Journal of Applied Research and Technology

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://jart.icat.unam.mx/index.php/jart/article/view/931/765

100.1.#.a: Napitupulu, Darmawan

524.#.#.a: Napitupulu, Darmawan (2020). User-Acceptance instrument development: a content validity study in the e-participation context. Journal of Applied Research and Technology; Vol 18 No 1, 2020. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4110241

245.1.0.a: User-Acceptance instrument development: a content validity study in the e-participation context

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2020

264.#.1.c: 2020-03-20

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2020-03-20, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistas@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://jart.icat.unam.mx/index.php/jart/article/view/931

001.#.#.#: oai:ojs2.localhost:article/931

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Although research related to e-participation is developing, its instrument development has not given sufficient attention. Previous studies showed limited report about content validity issues especially in the IS/IT field. This study has the purpose to develop user-acceptance instruments in the context of e-participation, especially the E-Lapor application. Since this study reuses the items and constructs in a context that is quite different from the previous research, using existing instruments may not ensure that items are still valid. As such, we re-establish the validity in the e-participation context to ensure that the items represent the construct and that each individual item measures what it is intended to measure. The method used is content validity with a quantitative approach namely Aiken. The results showed that of 18 constructs and 75 items developed initially, there were 11 items that had not been greater than significant values based on expert opinions. Those items have been deleted to reach significant standards. Thus, there are only 64 items that are valid and reliable. The implication of this study is to provide an opportunity for more IS/IT researchers to conduct content validity assessment for their instrument development.

773.1.#.t: Journal of Applied Research and Technology; Vol 18 No 1 (2020)

773.1.#.o: http://jart.icat.unam.mx/index.php/jart

046.#.#.j: 2021-04-13 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2448-6736; ISSN: 1665-6423

310.#.#.a: Bimestral

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://jart.icat.unam.mx/index.php/jart

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/icat.24486736e.2020.18.1.931

handle: 06f92919a0a19cd6

harvesting_date: 2021-03-08 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2021-01-13 02:28:35.0

file_modification_date: 2021-01-13 02:28:35.0

file_creator: Yolanda G.G.

file_name: 270d07ce86175c62126897eff36f39d67dafb094aa5bae11a0c1a3fe9a5ab735.pdf

file_pages_number: 10

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.7

file_size: 452587

last_modified: 2021-04-15 12:10:00.000

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

User-Acceptance instrument development: a content validity study in the e-participation context

Napitupulu, Darmawan

Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas y Tecnología, UNAM, publicado en Journal of Applied Research and Technology, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Napitupulu, Darmawan (2020). User-Acceptance instrument development: a content validity study in the e-participation context. Journal of Applied Research and Technology; Vol 18 No 1, 2020. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4110241

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Napitupulu, Darmawan
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Ingenierías
Título
User-Acceptance instrument development: a content validity study in the e-participation context
Fecha
2020-03-20
Resumen
Although research related to e-participation is developing, its instrument development has not given sufficient attention. Previous studies showed limited report about content validity issues especially in the IS/IT field. This study has the purpose to develop user-acceptance instruments in the context of e-participation, especially the E-Lapor application. Since this study reuses the items and constructs in a context that is quite different from the previous research, using existing instruments may not ensure that items are still valid. As such, we re-establish the validity in the e-participation context to ensure that the items represent the construct and that each individual item measures what it is intended to measure. The method used is content validity with a quantitative approach namely Aiken. The results showed that of 18 constructs and 75 items developed initially, there were 11 items that had not been greater than significant values based on expert opinions. Those items have been deleted to reach significant standards. Thus, there are only 64 items that are valid and reliable. The implication of this study is to provide an opportunity for more IS/IT researchers to conduct content validity assessment for their instrument development.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2448-6736; ISSN: 1665-6423

Enlaces