dor_id: 43115

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: si

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34169/31154

100.1.#.a: Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel; Baires Várguez, Laura; González Rodríguez, Víctor Manuel; Tinajero Morales, Carlos; Sánchez García, Sergio

524.#.#.a: Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel, et al. (2012). Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 4-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43115

245.1.0.a: Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2012

264.#.1.c: 2012-10-31

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2012-10-31, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/34169

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Objective: To determine hypochlorite concentration of solutions used for root canal irrigation and compare them with concentrations deemed as “ideal” in scientific literature ( 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v)) Methods Opinion survey among endodontic specialists to ascertain sodium hypochlorite commercial brand most used in root canals irrigation. Iodometric titration to determine solution concentrations. Clorox Regular Bleach ( Oakland, California) commercial brand most referred to in literature. Mean comparison  of different commercial brands and lots. Concentrations deemed ideal 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v). Results Commercial brands of sodium hypochlorite most used by 192 endodontic specialists were as follows: Cloralex ( 43.2%), Concentrated Clorox (30.2%), Viarzoni-t (16.7%), Great Value ( 1.0%), “Los Patitos” (0.5%) and other brands ( 8.3%). Concentration ( mean IC 95%) of Clorox Regular Bleach (6.34%, 6.32 – 6.36) Concentrated Clorox ( 5.43%, 5.42-5.45%), Cloralex  (5.40%, %.38-5.41), Great Value ( 6.21% 6.19-6.23) and “ Los Patitos” ( 5.82%, 5.80-5.83) exceeded a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite concentration. Viarzone-T ( 2.86%, 2.85-2.87)  rated above the 2.5% hypochlorite  concentration. There were statistically significant differences (p≤0.001) among averages of different commercial brands and lots, with respect to concentrations deemed as ideal (5.25% and 2.5% (w/ v ). Conclusion Hypochlorite concentrations in commonly used commercial products are not the concentration recommended in scientific literature ( 5.25% w/v and 2.5 % w/v). This can cause tissue damage in cases when hypochlorite solutions are improperly used without field isolation

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 4-ING

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/index

handle: 6a89c3e03eae5c8a

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-e29d8ad31524bd0d41e6c871a2c49899

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products

Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel; Baires Várguez, Laura; González Rodríguez, Víctor Manuel; Tinajero Morales, Carlos; Sánchez García, Sergio

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel, et al. (2012). Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 16, No 4-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43115

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Cárdenas Bahena, Ángel; Baires Várguez, Laura; González Rodríguez, Víctor Manuel; Tinajero Morales, Carlos; Sánchez García, Sergio
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Use of sodium Hypochlorite in root canal irrigation. Opinion survey and concentration in commercial products
Fecha
2012-10-31
Resumen
Objective: To determine hypochlorite concentration of solutions used for root canal irrigation and compare them with concentrations deemed as “ideal” in scientific literature ( 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v)) Methods Opinion survey among endodontic specialists to ascertain sodium hypochlorite commercial brand most used in root canals irrigation. Iodometric titration to determine solution concentrations. Clorox Regular Bleach ( Oakland, California) commercial brand most referred to in literature. Mean comparison  of different commercial brands and lots. Concentrations deemed ideal 5.25% and 2.5% (w / v). Results Commercial brands of sodium hypochlorite most used by 192 endodontic specialists were as follows: Cloralex ( 43.2%), Concentrated Clorox (30.2%), Viarzoni-t (16.7%), Great Value ( 1.0%), “Los Patitos” (0.5%) and other brands ( 8.3%). Concentration ( mean IC 95%) of Clorox Regular Bleach (6.34%, 6.32 – 6.36) Concentrated Clorox ( 5.43%, 5.42-5.45%), Cloralex  (5.40%, %.38-5.41), Great Value ( 6.21% 6.19-6.23) and “ Los Patitos” ( 5.82%, 5.80-5.83) exceeded a 5.25% sodium hypochlorite concentration. Viarzone-T ( 2.86%, 2.85-2.87)  rated above the 2.5% hypochlorite  concentration. There were statistically significant differences (p≤0.001) among averages of different commercial brands and lots, with respect to concentrations deemed as ideal (5.25% and 2.5% (w/ v ). Conclusion Hypochlorite concentrations in commonly used commercial products are not the concentration recommended in scientific literature ( 5.25% w/v and 2.5 % w/v). This can cause tissue damage in cases when hypochlorite solutions are improperly used without field isolation
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces