dor_id: 4111620

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/62313/55040

100.1.#.a: Manabe, Kazuchika

524.#.#.a: Manabe, Kazuchika (2017). The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111620

245.1.0.a: The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2017

264.#.1.c: 2017-09-01

653.#.#.a: Skinner box; video-tracking system; vocal-recognition system; automated system

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/62313

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/62313

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: A typical Skinner box has three essential features: discriminanda, an operandum, and a device for delivering reinforcers, usually a feeder. These features correspond to Skinner’s three-term contingency consisting of a stimulus, a response, and a consequence. In a typical operant experiment, the operandum is used to measure a response topography that the animal emits easily and the baseline level of which is high enough to be conditioned as operant response, for example, lever pressing for rats and key pecking for pigeons. Because those responses can be detected using a microswitch, a human observer is not required to detect the response. However, the natural response repertoire of animals is not limited to such contact responses with the operandum. Many researchers have developed various automated experimental systems designed to detect responses other than contact responses with the operanda, for example, locomotion, turning responses, and vocalization. Recent technologies make it possible to detect responses such as these latter ones in real time without a human observer. The present paper provides a developmental history of how the components of the Skinner box have been modified to detect response topographies other than contact responding to a particular operandum.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 (2017)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v43.i2.62313

handle: 2addeb0b91990983

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2017-11-24 21:54:30.0

file_modification_date: 2017-11-24 21:54:31.0

file_name: ee3a179aa6412022272937326d0caa0beb420416174b2e915b967e51515cd6f8.pdf

file_pages_number: 20

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 717820

245.1.0.b: The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization

Manabe, Kazuchika

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Manabe, Kazuchika (2017). The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 43 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111620

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Manabe, Kazuchika
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
The Skinner Box Evolving to Detect Movement and Vocalization
Fecha
2017-09-01
Resumen
A typical Skinner box has three essential features: discriminanda, an operandum, and a device for delivering reinforcers, usually a feeder. These features correspond to Skinner’s three-term contingency consisting of a stimulus, a response, and a consequence. In a typical operant experiment, the operandum is used to measure a response topography that the animal emits easily and the baseline level of which is high enough to be conditioned as operant response, for example, lever pressing for rats and key pecking for pigeons. Because those responses can be detected using a microswitch, a human observer is not required to detect the response. However, the natural response repertoire of animals is not limited to such contact responses with the operandum. Many researchers have developed various automated experimental systems designed to detect responses other than contact responses with the operanda, for example, locomotion, turning responses, and vocalization. Recent technologies make it possible to detect responses such as these latter ones in real time without a human observer. The present paper provides a developmental history of how the components of the Skinner box have been modified to detect response topographies other than contact responding to a particular operandum.
Tema
Skinner box; video-tracking system; vocal-recognition system; automated system
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces