dor_id: 21014

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Se reciben trabajos de cualquier autor independientemente de su ubicación geográfica y deben pasar por un proceso de revisión por pares doble ciego

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: https://www.juridicas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Ciencias Sociales y Económicas

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/index

351.#.#.b: Mexican Law Review

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/10434/12510

100.1.#.a: Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo

524.#.#.a: Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo (2016). The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System. Mexican Law Review; Volume IX, number 1, 2016; 121-139. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/21014

245.1.0.a: The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2016

264.#.1.c: 2016-06-22

653.#.#.a: Right to the Truth; Forced Disappearance of Persons; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; Inter-American Human Rights System

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico mexlawrev@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/10434

001.#.#.#: 081.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/10434

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: The evolution of Inter-American Court case law and the advances made by international bodies and instruments, as well as those in domestic legislation, clearly reveal that the right to the truth is now recognized as an autonomous and independent right. Although this right is not expressly included in the American Convention, it does not prevent the Inter-American Court from being able to examine any alleged violation of this right, and declaring that it has been violated, according to Article 29 of the Pact of San José. The author of this opinion considers that although the right to the truth is mainly related to the right of access to justice derived from Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention, it should not necessarily remain subsumed in the examination of the other violations of the rights to the judicial guarantees and judicial protection that were declared in a case because this understanding encourages the distortion of the essence and intrinsic content of each right. The author considers that the Inter-American Court should reconsider its criteria regarding the fact that the right to the truth is necessarily “subsumed” in the victims’ and their families’ right to have the competent State bodies elucidate the violations and corresponding responsibilities, in order to proceed, when appropriate, to declare its violation as an autonomous and independent right. This would clarify the content, dimensions and true scope of the right to know the truth.

773.1.#.t: Mexican Law Review; Volume IX, number 1, july-december 2016; 121-139

773.1.#.o: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN impreso: 1870-0578; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5306

310.#.#.a: Semestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 121-139

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.09.007

harvesting_date: 2023-10-03 16:10:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

245.1.0.b: The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System

last_modified: 2023-10-03 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-520a1a7a10a330492a0d09d76c62073d

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System

Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo

Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, publicado en Mexican Law Review, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo (2016). The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System. Mexican Law Review; Volume IX, number 1, 2016; 121-139. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/21014

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Ferrer Mac-Gregor, Eduardo
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Ciencias Sociales y Económicas
Título
The Right to the Truth as an Autonomous Right Under the Interamerican Human Rights System
Fecha
2016-06-22
Resumen
The evolution of Inter-American Court case law and the advances made by international bodies and instruments, as well as those in domestic legislation, clearly reveal that the right to the truth is now recognized as an autonomous and independent right. Although this right is not expressly included in the American Convention, it does not prevent the Inter-American Court from being able to examine any alleged violation of this right, and declaring that it has been violated, according to Article 29 of the Pact of San José. The author of this opinion considers that although the right to the truth is mainly related to the right of access to justice derived from Articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention, it should not necessarily remain subsumed in the examination of the other violations of the rights to the judicial guarantees and judicial protection that were declared in a case because this understanding encourages the distortion of the essence and intrinsic content of each right. The author considers that the Inter-American Court should reconsider its criteria regarding the fact that the right to the truth is necessarily “subsumed” in the victims’ and their families’ right to have the competent State bodies elucidate the violations and corresponding responsibilities, in order to proceed, when appropriate, to declare its violation as an autonomous and independent right. This would clarify the content, dimensions and true scope of the right to know the truth.
Tema
Right to the Truth; Forced Disappearance of Persons; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; Inter-American Human Rights System
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN impreso: 1870-0578; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5306

Enlaces