dor_id: 4138568

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Bitácora Arquitectura", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Ulrichsweb; PERIODICA; EBSCO

561.#.#.u: http://arquitectura.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Multidisciplina

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Divulgación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/index

351.#.#.b: Bitácora Arquitectura

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/56128/49776

100.1.#.a: Griffen, Craig S.

524.#.#.a: Griffen, Craig S. (2015). The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy. Bitácora Arquitectura; Núm. 30, 2015: Arquitectura, Ciudad y Emociones; 14-19. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4138568

245.1.0.a: The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2016-06-13

653.#.#.a: online instruction; design pedagogy; architectual educatio

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico bitacoraunam@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/article/view/56128

001.#.#.#: 026.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56128

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The role of online instruction in architectural education has been cause for much recent debate. Lecture-based online courses, where one instructor presents to an unlimited number of recipients, translate better to online delivery and have been more favorably received. However, teaching design studios with this new technology has been cause for much more hand wringing. The advent of new technology in any field is often met with a mix of heightened expectations and cautious trepidation so a similar reaction to online technology is not surprising. The strength of the studio methodology has long been based on its immediacy of face-to-face interaction between teacher and pupil, as well as the camaraderie and community of a shared experience; assets harder to translate over distance. Based on research of the handful of architecture programs currently teaching studio courses with this method, I have summarized the results into common benefits and challenges with which we can evaluate the problem to understand which initial concerns are still valid and which may be unfounded.

773.1.#.t: Bitácora Arquitectura; Núm. 30 (2015): Arquitectura, Ciudad y Emociones; 14-19

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/bitacora/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2594-0856; ISSN impreso: 1405-8901

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 14-19

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/fa.14058901p.2015.30.56128

handle: 00f53d99836241a9

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2015-07-30 18:44:12.0

file_modification_date: 2016-05-24 17:01:45.0

file_name: fdc46a633b3e2a64660d4869e3e404986fb62f6e149c78a7c55302e537014d4f.pdf

file_pages_number: 6

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 3737117

245.1.0.b: The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy

Griffen, Craig S.

Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM, publicado en Bitácora Arquitectura, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Arquitectura, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Griffen, Craig S. (2015). The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy. Bitácora Arquitectura; Núm. 30, 2015: Arquitectura, Ciudad y Emociones; 14-19. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4138568

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Griffen, Craig S.
Tipo
Artículo de Divulgación
Área del conocimiento
Multidisciplina
Título
The Online Studio Problem: Assessing the Role of Distance Learning in Design Pedagogy
Fecha
2016-06-13
Resumen
The role of online instruction in architectural education has been cause for much recent debate. Lecture-based online courses, where one instructor presents to an unlimited number of recipients, translate better to online delivery and have been more favorably received. However, teaching design studios with this new technology has been cause for much more hand wringing. The advent of new technology in any field is often met with a mix of heightened expectations and cautious trepidation so a similar reaction to online technology is not surprising. The strength of the studio methodology has long been based on its immediacy of face-to-face interaction between teacher and pupil, as well as the camaraderie and community of a shared experience; assets harder to translate over distance. Based on research of the handful of architecture programs currently teaching studio courses with this method, I have summarized the results into common benefits and challenges with which we can evaluate the problem to understand which initial concerns are still valid and which may be unfounded.
Tema
online instruction; design pedagogy; architectual educatio
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2594-0856; ISSN impreso: 1405-8901

Enlaces