La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico critica.ojs@filosoficas.unam.mx.
Ver términos de la licenciaIbarra, Andoni, et al. (2001). The Dissatisfaction of Traditional Philosophy of Science with the Concept of Representation. Reply to Sergio Martínez. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 33 Núm. 99, 2001; 97-109. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115411
Autor(es)
Ibarra, Andoni; Mormann, Thomas
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
The Dissatisfaction of Traditional Philosophy of Science with the Concept of Representation. Reply to Sergio Martínez
Fecha
2019-01-07
Resumen
In this reply to Martínez"s discussion of our paper "Una teoría combinatoria de las representaciones científicas" (UTC) we argue that his criticism is informed by the uncritical acceptance of some traditional dichotomies and a rather distorted interpretation of the history of philosophy. We point out that UTC should not be characterized as a formalist approach. The distinction between "formalist" and "historicist" accounts in philosophy of science is obsolete. Hence, formal and informal means are useful for the explication of the concept of representation to be considered as a key concept of UTC. Moreover, we argue that the arguments from history of philosophy Martínez launches against our account are ill-founded.
Tema
representation; formalist account and historicist account; representación; enfoque formalista y enfoque historicista
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503
