dor_id: 24237

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: El sistema de arbitraje es ciego; por pares anónimos, externos.

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), SCOPUS, Web Of Science (WoS)

561.#.#.u: http://www.ib.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Biología y Química

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/281/1204

100.1.#.a: Macip Ríos, Rodrigo; Ontiveros, Rebeca; López Alcaide, Saúl; Casas Andreu, Gustavo

100.1.#.u: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla

524.#.#.a: Macip Ríos, Rodrigo, et al. (2015). The conservation status of the freshwater and terrestrial turtles of Mexico: a critical review of biodiversity conservation strategies. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 86, núm. 4, 2015: diciembre. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/24237

245.1.0.a: The conservation status of the freshwater and terrestrial turtles of Mexico: a critical review of biodiversity conservation strategies

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Biología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2015-11-10

653.#.#.a: Conservation priorities; Cuatrocienegas; Dermatemys mawii

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2015-11-10, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de falvarez@ib.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio/article/view/281

001.#.#.#: oai:ojs.132.248.13.2:article/281

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: The continental turtle fauna of Mexico is composed of seven families, 13 genera, and 45 species; when subspecies are included, a total of 61 distinct taxa are recognized. We searched for the imperiled level or protection status of each taxon according to the IUCN Red List, CITES appendices, the 25 most endangered freshwater turtles and tortoises, and the protection lists issued by the Mexican Government. We explored the overlap of conservation status between Mexican and international agencies by comparing listing status. Among the 61 taxa, 37 were in the IUCN Red List; 16 taxa were listed on CITES appendices; 39 taxa were NOM-059; four taxa were in CONABIO’s list; and only one species was included in the world’s 25 most endangered freshwater turtles and tortoises. The Central American river turtle (Dermatemys mawii), the desert tortoises (Gopherus spp.) and the black soft shell turtle (Apalone atra) were the only taxa included in all the lists surveyed. Our comparison of the lists indicates that at least 25 taxa of Mexican turtles are lacking basic information and require further study to inform their comprehensive conservation status. Further, we detected a noteworthy discrepancy between international and Mexican conservation priorities for turtle conservation.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 86, núm. 4 (2015): diciembre

773.1.#.o: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

046.#.#.j: 2021-02-09 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: 2007-8706; 1870-3453

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

780.1.2.t: Anales del Instituto de Biología serie Botánica y Anales del Instituto de Biología serie Zoología

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Biología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://www.revista.ib.unam.mx/index.php/bio

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmb.2015.09.013

handle: 00f0c6fcbb36f53a

harvesting_date: 2020-09-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_modification_date: 2016-10-12 18:19:14.0

last_modified: 2021-02-05 13:05:24.322

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-1f274eac7d6a9bd521112d9f048537bf

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

The conservation status of the freshwater and terrestrial turtles of Mexico: a critical review of biodiversity conservation strategies

Macip Ríos, Rodrigo; Ontiveros, Rebeca; López Alcaide, Saúl; Casas Andreu, Gustavo

Instituto de Biología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Macip Ríos, Rodrigo, et al. (2015). The conservation status of the freshwater and terrestrial turtles of Mexico: a critical review of biodiversity conservation strategies. Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad; Vol. 86, núm. 4, 2015: diciembre. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/24237

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Macip Ríos, Rodrigo; Ontiveros, Rebeca; López Alcaide, Saúl; Casas Andreu, Gustavo
Adscripción del autor
Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Biología y Química
Título
The conservation status of the freshwater and terrestrial turtles of Mexico: a critical review of biodiversity conservation strategies
Fecha
2015-11-10
Resumen
The continental turtle fauna of Mexico is composed of seven families, 13 genera, and 45 species; when subspecies are included, a total of 61 distinct taxa are recognized. We searched for the imperiled level or protection status of each taxon according to the IUCN Red List, CITES appendices, the 25 most endangered freshwater turtles and tortoises, and the protection lists issued by the Mexican Government. We explored the overlap of conservation status between Mexican and international agencies by comparing listing status. Among the 61 taxa, 37 were in the IUCN Red List; 16 taxa were listed on CITES appendices; 39 taxa were NOM-059; four taxa were in CONABIO’s list; and only one species was included in the world’s 25 most endangered freshwater turtles and tortoises. The Central American river turtle (Dermatemys mawii), the desert tortoises (Gopherus spp.) and the black soft shell turtle (Apalone atra) were the only taxa included in all the lists surveyed. Our comparison of the lists indicates that at least 25 taxa of Mexican turtles are lacking basic information and require further study to inform their comprehensive conservation status. Further, we detected a noteworthy discrepancy between international and Mexican conservation priorities for turtle conservation.
Tema
Conservation priorities; Cuatrocienegas; Dermatemys mawii
Idioma
eng
ISSN
2007-8706; 1870-3453

Enlaces