Sobre a lógica deôntica não-clássica
Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C.A.
Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM
dor_id: 4115346
506.#.#.a: Público
590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única
510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory
561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/
650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades
336.#.#.b: article
336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación
336.#.#.a: Artículo
351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica
351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía
351.#.#.a: Artículos
harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM
270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx
590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)
270.#.#.d: MX
270.1.#.d: México
590.#.#.b: Concentrador
883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/
883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM
590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural
883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/
883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial
850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/639/616
100.1.#.a: Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C.A.
524.#.#.a: Puga, Leila Z., et al. (1987). Sobre a lógica deôntica não-clássica. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 19 Núm. 55, 1987; 19-37. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115346
245.1.0.a: Sobre a lógica deôntica não-clássica
502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM
264.#.0.c: 1987
264.#.1.c: 2018-12-10
506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx
884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/639
001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/639
041.#.7.h: spa
520.3.#.a: Our starting point, in this basically expository paper, is the study of a classical system of deontic propositional logic, classical in the sense that it constitutes an extension of the classical propositional calculus. It is noted, then, that the system excludes ab initio the possibility of the existence of real moral dilemmas (contradictory obligations and prohibitions), and also can not cope smoothly with the so-called prima facie moral dilemmas. So, we develop a non-classical, paraconsistent system of propositional deontic logic which is compatible with such dilemmas, real or prima facie. In our paraconsistent system one can handle them neatly, in particular one can directly investigate their force, operational meaning, and the most important consequences of their acceptance as not uncommon moral facts. Of course, we are conscious that other procedures for dealing with them are at hand, for example by the weakening of the specific deontic axioms. It is not argued that our procedure is the best, at least as regards the present state of the issue. We think only that owing, among other reasons, to the circumstance that the basic ethical concepts are intrinsically vague, it seems quite difficult to get rid of moral dilemmas and of moral deadlocks in general. Apparently this speaks in favour of a paraconsistent approach to ethics. At any rate, a final appraisal of the possible solutions to the problem of dilemmas and deadlocks, if there is one, constitutes a matter of ethical theory and not only of logic. On the other hand, the paraconsistency stance looks likely to be relevant also in the field of legal logic. It is shown, in outline, that the systems considered are sound and complete, relative to a natural semantics. All results of this paper can be extended to first-order and to higher-order logics. Such extensions give rise to the question of the transparency (or oppacity) of the deontic contexts. As we shall argue in forthcoming articles, they normally are transparent. [L.Z.P., N.C.A. da C.] (PDF en portugués)
773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 19 Núm. 55 (1987); 19-37
773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica
022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503
310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral
300.#.#.a: Páginas: 19-37
264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM
doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1987.639
handle: 00eee368a03a74ba
harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0
856.#.0.q: application/pdf
file_creation_date: 2010-10-11 19:03:51.0
file_modification_date: 2010-10-29 18:42:49.0
file_creator: IIFs
file_name: cf46100733eb016c2eb14ecc9c1a92198303cc8fb9024fc23389a77dbc629857.pdf
file_pages_number: 19
file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6
file_size: 179465
245.1.0.b: Sobre una lógica deóntica no clásica
last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es
license_type: by-nc-nd
Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C.A.
Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM
Puga, Leila Z., et al. (1987). Sobre a lógica deôntica não-clássica. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 19 Núm. 55, 1987; 19-37. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115346