dor_id: 4133445

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Geofísica Internacional", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Dialnet, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Geobase

561.#.#.u: https://www.geofisica.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

351.#.#.b: Geofísica Internacional

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/169/161

100.1.#.a: Valenzuela Wong, Raúl; León Soto, Gerardo

524.#.#.a: Valenzuela Wong, Raúl, et al. (2017). Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Flow in Mexico: What Have we Learned?. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 56 Núm. 2: Abril 1, 2017; 187-217. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4133445

245.1.0.a: Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Flow in Mexico: What Have we Learned?

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2017

264.#.1.c: 2017-04-01

653.#.#.a: partición de ondas S; anisotropía del manto superior; flujo del manto; movimientos de placas; Fosa Mesoamericana; placas de Cocos; Rivera; Pacífico y América del Norte; shear wave splitting; upper mantle anisotropy; mantle flow; plate motions; Middle America Trench; Cocos; Rivera; Pacific; North American plates

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistagi@igeofisica.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/169

001.#.#.#: 063.oai:revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx:article/169

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: A review is presented of the shear wave splitting studies of the upper mantle carried out in Mexico during the last decade. When a seismic wave enters an anisotropic medium it splits, which means that a fast and a slow wave are produced. Two parameters are used to quantify anisotropy. These are the fast polarization direction and the delay time between the fast and the slow wave. An example of the measurement technique is presented using an SKS phase because most observations are based on teleseismic data. Results of two studies using local S waves from intraslab earthquakes are also discussed. Key aspects of the interpretation of splitting measurements are explained. These include the depth localization of anisotropy, the relation-ship between olivine fabrics and mantle flow, the role of absolute plate motion, and the role of relative plate motions with a special focus on subduction zones. An important motivation for studying seismic anisotropy is that it makes it possible to constrain the characteristics of upper mantle flow and its relationship to tectonic processes. Mexico has many diverse tectonic environments, some of which are currently active, or were formerly active, and have left their imprint on seismic anisotropy. This has resulted in a wide variety of mechanisms for driving mantle flow. Broadly speaking, the discussion is organized into the following regions: Baja California peninsula, Western Mexican Basin and Range, northern and northeastern Mexico, the Middle America Trench, the Yucatán peninsula, and lowermost mantle anisotropy. Depending on the unique characteristics encountered within each region, the relationship between anisotropy and mantle flow is explored.doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2017.56.2.1765

773.1.#.t: Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 56 Núm. 2: Abril 1, 2017; 187-217

773.1.#.o: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

022.#.#.a: ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 187-217

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2017.56.2.1765

handle: 00b5901690703d18

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2017-06-21 23:16:01.0

file_modification_date: 2022-05-27 17:42:25.0

file_creator: Raúl W. Valenzuela

file_name: 3103483b2f8a397c6a6cf129db89fa66d97314d3aac8b39dea6840658be4fb86.pdf

file_pages_number: 31

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 1882007

245.1.0.b: Shear Wave Splitting and Mantle Flow in Mexico: What Have we Learned?

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-sa

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2