dor_id: 20924

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Se reciben trabajos de cualquier autor independientemente de su ubicación geográfica y deben pasar por un proceso de revisión por pares doble ciego

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: https://www.juridicas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Ciencias Sociales y Económicas

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/index

351.#.#.b: Mexican Law Review

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/7801/9776

100.1.#.a: Mexican Law Review

524.#.#.a: Mexican Law Review (2014). Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas. Mexican Law Review; Volume VI, Number 2. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/20924

245.1.0.a: Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2014

264.#.1.c: 2014-01-01

653.#.#.a: Mexican foreign policy; border; labor migration; anti-Americanism; Política exterior mexicana; frontera; migración laboral; antiamericanismo

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico mexlawrev@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/article/view/7801

001.#.#.#: 081.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/7801

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: This note examines the political context surrounding the banning of the Mexican American Studies program in Tucson, Arizona and the Acosta v. Huppenthal decision, which leaves the ban largely intact. The convergence of economic crisis and partisan politics contributed to the rise in anxiety over the demographic shifts of the state of Arizona, for which Mexican American Studies became a symbolic target for Republicans. Mexican American Studies was declared in violation of a new law passed by the Republican dominated legislature, A.R.S. § 15-112, by Arizona Superintendent John Huppenthal, despite the conclusion by an independent audit he ordered which concluded otherwise. This left leaders within the Mexican American community and civil rights organizations with the conclusion that the ban on Mexican American Studies was politically motivated. This note explores the motivations by individual political actors, such as the current Attorney General of Arizona Tom Horne, and how he rose to power on a platform centered on the ban against Mexican American Studies.

773.1.#.t: Mexican Law Review; Volume VI, Number 2

773.1.#.o: https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/mexican-law-review/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN impreso: 1870-0578; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5306

310.#.#.a: Semestral

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1870-0578(16)30017-8

harvesting_date: 2023-10-03 16:10:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

245.1.0.b: Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas

last_modified: 2023-10-03 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-d3e8bcf3debc43a9fc58e556de3a1843

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas

Mexican Law Review

Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM, publicado en Mexican Law Review, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Mexican Law Review (2014). Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas. Mexican Law Review; Volume VI, Number 2. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/20924

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Mexican Law Review
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Ciencias Sociales y Económicas
Título
Reciprocity in Mexican Relations with the United States: Past Indicators of Future Dilemmas
Fecha
2014-01-01
Resumen
This note examines the political context surrounding the banning of the Mexican American Studies program in Tucson, Arizona and the Acosta v. Huppenthal decision, which leaves the ban largely intact. The convergence of economic crisis and partisan politics contributed to the rise in anxiety over the demographic shifts of the state of Arizona, for which Mexican American Studies became a symbolic target for Republicans. Mexican American Studies was declared in violation of a new law passed by the Republican dominated legislature, A.R.S. § 15-112, by Arizona Superintendent John Huppenthal, despite the conclusion by an independent audit he ordered which concluded otherwise. This left leaders within the Mexican American community and civil rights organizations with the conclusion that the ban on Mexican American Studies was politically motivated. This note explores the motivations by individual political actors, such as the current Attorney General of Arizona Tom Horne, and how he rose to power on a platform centered on the ban against Mexican American Studies.
Tema
Mexican foreign policy; border; labor migration; anti-Americanism; Política exterior mexicana; frontera; migración laboral; antiamericanismo
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN impreso: 1870-0578; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5306

Enlaces