La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistainvestedu@gmail.com.
Ver términos de la licenciaFortoul, Teresa Imelda, et al. (2024). Proposal of rubrics for evaluating doctoral candidacy. Investigación en Educación Médica; Vol. 13 Núm. 52, 2024; 49-61. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4159626
Autor(es)
Fortoul, Teresa Imelda; Ochoa Cabrera, Alba; Muñoz Comonfort, Armando
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Proposal of rubrics for evaluating doctoral candidacy
Fecha
2024-09-27
Resumen
Introduction: It is desirable to have a rubric that assesses both written and oral skills because the doctoral candidacy examination is a high-stakes assessment. Objective: To provide evidence of the validity of the use of rubrics in the assessment of students’ performance on the doctoral candidacy examination. Method: Non-experimental cross-sectional study. A rubric was used that was modified from a previous one that evaluated the written part of the exam and another for the oral presentation. For both, a numerical scale was used to determine whether candidacy was granted or not. It was applied to 195 students of the generations 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022 from all disciplinary areas. Reliability analysis, mean difference, and factor analysis to extract principal components have been performed. Results: According to Messick, at least three sources of evidence for validity were obtained. Generation, gender of students, number of synods, and scores on the written and oral assessments did not differ in the numerical scores. The factorial analysis of both versions was grouped into a single dimension for the written section and into two for the oral section. Conclusion: The new form of evaluation has worked and shows positive results, since the evaluation is more objective than the previous one, and the fact that it is collegial has allowed the unification of the evaluation among the Synods. With this instrument, written and oral communication skills are evaluated independently, and it will be interesting to follow up on the relevance of this separation on the results of the evaluation of the candidacy.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2007-5057; ISSN impreso: 2007-865X
