Artículo

Prebriefing: How are standards of Best Practice implemented? An experience from Argentina

Latugaye, Dolores; Astoul Bonorino, Carolina

Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, publicado en Investigación en Educación Médica y cosechado de y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistainvestedu@gmail.com. Ver términos de la licencia

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Latugaye, Dolores, et al. (2024). Prebriefing: How are standards of Best Practice implemented? An experience from Argentina. Investigación en Educación Médica; Vol. 13 Núm. 51, 2024; 53-60. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4159635

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Latugaye, Dolores; Astoul Bonorino, Carolina
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Prebriefing: How are standards of Best Practice implemented? An experience from Argentina
Fecha
2024-06-27
Resumen
Introduction: Simulation Standards of Best Practice recommend starting the simulation-based experience or education (SBE) with a prebriefing. Not including it or doing it incompletely can undermine the safe learning environment. Objective: the objective of this study is to describe the quality of prebriefing carried out during 2022 in a private not-for-profit university in Argentina, according to the International Nursing Association of Clinical Simulation and Learning Best Practice (INACSL). Method: This is a descriptive, exploratory, and cross-sectional study. All complete records of EBS carried out within the framework of usual academic activities, from January 1 to December 31, 2022, were included. Data was obtained from a secondary database, which included the prebriefing components suggested by the good practice standards. Descriptive statistics were used for the analysis. Results: Prebriefing of 177 EBS were analyzed. More than half included at least 9 of the 12 items suggested by international recommendations, which is why they presented a quality categorized as “high” and “intermediate”. Conclusions: Although most of the prebriefing was of high quality, these results invite us to plan and develop support and continuous training programs for facilitators and instructors to promote the incorporation of those aspects that were not included 70% of the time.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2007-5057; ISSN impreso: 2007-865X

Enlaces