dor_id: 43207

506.#.#.a: Público

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/50810/45538

100.1.#.a: Hernández Padrón, Genoveva; García Garduño, Margarita V; Rodríguez Rocha, Alejandra Citlalli; García Aranda, Raúl Luis

524.#.#.a: Hernández Padrón, Genoveva, et al. (2015). Physicochemical analysis of MTA Angelus® and Biodentine® conducted with X ray difraction, dispersive energy spectrometry, X ray fl uorescence, scanning electron microscope and infra red spectroscopy. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 3; 2015. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43207

720.#.#.a: Hernández Padrón, Genoveva ; García Garduño, Margarita V ; Rodríguez Rocha, Alejandra Citlalli ; García Aranda, Raúl Luis

245.1.0.a: Physicochemical analysis of MTA Angelus® and Biodentine® conducted with X ray difraction, dispersive energy spectrometry, X ray fl uorescence, scanning electron microscope and infra red spectroscopy

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2015-06-29

653.#.#.a: MTA Angelus®; Biodentinetm; DES; SEM; XRD; XRF; IRS

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2015-06-29, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/50810

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The aim of the present study was to characterize components of commercial cements used in dentistry MTA Angelus® White (AngelusLodrina, Parana Brazil) and BiodentineTM (Septodont, Saint-Maur-desFosses, France). Techniques used for said characterization were Scanning Electron Microscope, X-Ray Diffraction, X Ray Fluorescence,Electron Dispersion Spectrometry, and Infrared Spectroscopy. Both cements were mixed according to manufacturer’s instructions. A study of surface texture was conducted with ScanningElectron Microscope (SEM), and X Ray Diffraction (XRD) analysis,and X Ray fl uorescence analysis (XRF), an analysis of DispersiveEnergy Spectrometry (DES), as well as an Infra Red Spectroscopy(IRS) in order to determine functional groups. Results: In XRDanalysis, a difference was found: Biodentine exhibited Na2O andZrO2. These elements were absent in MTA. MTA presented Cr2O3and BiO2 which in turn were absent in Biodentine. EDS analysisrevealed that differences were found in the radio-opacifying agent,and that Biodentine presented CaCl2 differing in this from MTA.Statistical analysis conducted revealed statistically signifi cant percentagesin contents, even though components were found to bepractically the same. SEM analysis revealed marked differences:MTA presented irregular and porous surface whereas Biodentineexhibited irregular and fi lament form. Conclusion: There is a greatsimilarity in the chemical components of MTA Angelus and Biodentine,with the exception of chemical components providing radioopacity,the size and form of the grain, and, in Biodentine presenceof calcium chloride.

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 3, (2015)

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

handle: 56f590f69200dfc4

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-1d161b94943c1f0f1dee17a21b7534a7

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2