dor_id: 4138349

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/81162/71552

100.1.#.a: Spector Azoubel, Marcos; Micheletto, Nilza

524.#.#.a: Spector Azoubel, Marcos, et al. (2021). Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994). Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 47 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4138349

245.1.0.a: Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994)

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2021

264.#.1.c: 2021-11-03

653.#.#.a: symbolic behavior; stimulus equivalence; RFT; stimulus control; radical behaviorism

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/81162

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/81162

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Stimulus equivalence, as presented by Sidman and his colleagues, and relational frame theory, proposed by Hayes and his colleagues, are two of the main alternatives for explaining emergent relations between stimuli. The goal of this study is to analyze Hayes’s criticisms of Sidman’s conceptual contributions and Sidman’s criticisms of Hayes’s conceptual contributions between 1982 and 1994. Hayes and colleagues deviated from Sidman and colleagues when the former argued the following: contingencies that are systematically arranged by a verbal community seem to be necessary for the emergence of stimulus equivalence; that Sidman’s concept of stimulus equivalence fails to explain why nonverbal animals are not capable to demonstrating equivalence; and that Sidman’s concept of stimulus equivalence is merely descriptive and lacks a theoretical explanation for the emergence of the phenomenon. In turn, Sidman confronted some of these issues and argued that relational frame theory is based on hypothetical generalized operant behaviors, without a simple explanation based on known behavioral principles and without the necessary supporting data. He pointed to the various experimental studies that should be carried out to tackle the divergences that had appeared.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 47 Núm. 2 (2021)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v47.i2.81162

handle: 008efa1779791062

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2021-11-30 18:49:32.0

file_modification_date: 2021-12-10 00:28:39.0

file_name: e9e632b85f7d8a196ae1e4a18f1927ce8822bff6acf40d7bf4ffe3343b590eac.pdf

file_pages_number: 28

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.3

file_size: 698892

245.1.0.b: Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994)

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994)

Spector Azoubel, Marcos; Micheletto, Nilza

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Spector Azoubel, Marcos, et al. (2021). Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994). Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 47 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4138349

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Spector Azoubel, Marcos; Micheletto, Nilza
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Outlining a dialogue between Sidman and Hayes about emergent relations (1982-1994)
Fecha
2021-11-03
Resumen
Stimulus equivalence, as presented by Sidman and his colleagues, and relational frame theory, proposed by Hayes and his colleagues, are two of the main alternatives for explaining emergent relations between stimuli. The goal of this study is to analyze Hayes’s criticisms of Sidman’s conceptual contributions and Sidman’s criticisms of Hayes’s conceptual contributions between 1982 and 1994. Hayes and colleagues deviated from Sidman and colleagues when the former argued the following: contingencies that are systematically arranged by a verbal community seem to be necessary for the emergence of stimulus equivalence; that Sidman’s concept of stimulus equivalence fails to explain why nonverbal animals are not capable to demonstrating equivalence; and that Sidman’s concept of stimulus equivalence is merely descriptive and lacks a theoretical explanation for the emergence of the phenomenon. In turn, Sidman confronted some of these issues and argued that relational frame theory is based on hypothetical generalized operant behaviors, without a simple explanation based on known behavioral principles and without the necessary supporting data. He pointed to the various experimental studies that should be carried out to tackle the divergences that had appeared.
Tema
symbolic behavior; stimulus equivalence; RFT; stimulus control; radical behaviorism
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces