dor_id: 58878

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "INTERdisciplina", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: https://www.ceiich.unam.mx/0/index.php

650.#.4.x: Multidisciplina

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/index

351.#.#.b: INTERdisciplina

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/article/view/47629/42843

100.1.#.a: Schultz, Emily A.

524.#.#.a: Schultz, Emily A. (2015). Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects. INTER DISCIPLINA; Vol. 3 Núm. 5, 2015: Evolucionismo. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/58878

245.1.0.a: Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2015-02-04

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico rev.interd@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/article/view/47629

001.#.#.#: 068.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/47629

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: Many North American anthropologists remain deeply suspicious of attempts to theorize the evolution of culture, given the legacy in our discipline of nineteenth-century stagist theories of cultural evolution that were shaped by scientific racism. In the late twentieth-century, some theorists tried to escape this legacy by using formal models drawn from neo-Darwinian population biology to reconceptualize cultural evolutionary processes, but these more recent approaches have been found unsatisfactory for reasons of their own. For example, gene-culture coevolution and the dual inheritance theory have limited appeal to many contemporary cultural anthropologists because these theories rely on definitions of culture, and assumptions about human individuals and social groups, that many cultural anthropologists no longer find persuasive.Niche construction, by contrast, appears more promising as a framework for connecting cultural change with biological and ecological change. Nevertheless, the innovative features of niche construction coexist uneasily alongside the same problematic features that limit the usefulness of gene-culture coevolution and dual inheritance theory in cultural anthropology. This article discusses anthropological concerns about niche construction theory, but also suggests ways in which some of them might be reduced if niche construction theory were to incorporate insights from developmental systems theory and actor network theory.

773.1.#.t: INTER DISCIPLINA; Vol. 3 Núm. 5 (2015): Evolucionismo

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/inter/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 2395-969X; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5705

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485705e.2015.5.47629

handle: 00e80b7f55c18ad8

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

245.1.0.b: Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-33f3daa325da54060bd4297fa0c3fa31

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects

Schultz, Emily A.

Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, UNAM, publicado en INTERdisciplina, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Ciencias y Humanidades, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Schultz, Emily A. (2015). Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects. INTER DISCIPLINA; Vol. 3 Núm. 5, 2015: Evolucionismo. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/58878

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Schultz, Emily A.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Multidisciplina
Título
Niche Construction and the Study of Culture Change in Anthropology: Challenges and Prospects
Fecha
2015-02-04
Resumen
Many North American anthropologists remain deeply suspicious of attempts to theorize the evolution of culture, given the legacy in our discipline of nineteenth-century stagist theories of cultural evolution that were shaped by scientific racism. In the late twentieth-century, some theorists tried to escape this legacy by using formal models drawn from neo-Darwinian population biology to reconceptualize cultural evolutionary processes, but these more recent approaches have been found unsatisfactory for reasons of their own. For example, gene-culture coevolution and the dual inheritance theory have limited appeal to many contemporary cultural anthropologists because these theories rely on definitions of culture, and assumptions about human individuals and social groups, that many cultural anthropologists no longer find persuasive.Niche construction, by contrast, appears more promising as a framework for connecting cultural change with biological and ecological change. Nevertheless, the innovative features of niche construction coexist uneasily alongside the same problematic features that limit the usefulness of gene-culture coevolution and dual inheritance theory in cultural anthropology. This article discusses anthropological concerns about niche construction theory, but also suggests ways in which some of them might be reduced if niche construction theory were to incorporate insights from developmental systems theory and actor network theory.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN: 2395-969X; ISSN electrónico: 2448-5705

Enlaces