La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico critica.ojs@filosoficas.unam.mx.
Ver términos de la licencia
Guariglia, Osvaldo N.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
¿Moral del deber o moral de la virtud?
Fecha
2018-12-07
Resumen
This paper is a discussion of the problem of translating theoretically well founded normative propositions into behaviourary maxims effectively applicable for moral agents. To this end I consider, in the first place, the solution proposed by the theorists of moral duty in its two forms: systematic morality and critical morality. First, the Kantian theory of intelligible will is examined and shown to be unsatisfactory. Secondly, I consider Hare"s proposal which presents itself as a variant on the problem of the weakness of the will; this solution turns out to be unsatisfactory as well. Then I consider the solution afforded by the morality of virtue from Aristotle to MacIntyre, in particular its application to the distinction between the akratés and the akólastos. It is shown in what manner this solution can open the way to cultural relativism, and from there to morality. I conclude by pointing out that the problem is at present an insoluble one whose terms I have tried to clarify.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503
