dor_id: 4123261

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los textos propuestos para publicación en Estudios de Cultura Maya son arbitrados por el sistema de doble ciego

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Web Of Science (Wos); DOAJ, Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (RedALyC)

561.#.#.u: http://www.iifilologicas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/index

351.#.#.b: Estudios de Cultura Maya

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/article/view/180/181

100.1.#.a: Jüngel, Peter

524.#.#.a: Jüngel, Peter (1991). Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses. Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 18, 1991. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4123261

245.1.0.a: Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1991

264.#.1.c: 2013-02-05

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico estudios@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/article/view/180

001.#.#.#: 052.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/180

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: In my doctoral thesis (in prep.) I discuss in an appendix (title: Mistakes and "Mistakes": To the ambivalence of mistakes methodological problems at the example Codex Madrid 75-76 (orig. in German) whether a correction of mistakes can uncritically be done. This is done as an examplarian study of methods analysing mistakes at the example of the cartouche of day-signs (named thus by me) that is arranged around the central picture. (The correction itself isn"t affected or doubted). Taken a casual distribution of the mistakes there as decisive criterion, one finds facts that can"t be decided or are contradictory in tendency to the aim. At last, as result of case studies, it had to be concluded that the mistakes are intentional, set in directedly and can be interpreted without any contradiction in Codex Madrid (short: CM) as a reflex of the shift of yearbearers, and, second place, taken the numerical equivalents of the day-signs in the long-count, as a system grouping sidereal months. While there especially interested in the consequences in respect of the grades of complexity of texts and systems in Mesoamerican codices and Maya-inscriptions, a possible objection against result and election of CM 75-76 as object of study will be prooved on the soundness of its foundation. This objection might be formulated like this: The source CM 75-76 is because of faultyness and hasty of its drawing-style unreliable and therefore unfit for such an examination.

773.1.#.t: Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 18 (1991)

773.1.#.o: https://revistas-filologicas.unam.mx/estudios-cultura-maya/index.php/ecm/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN impreso: 0185-2574; ISSN electrónico:2448-5179

310.#.#.a: Semestral

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.19130/iifl.ecm.1991.18.180

handle: 6f16aa8dfd485514

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2012-12-04 16:10:20.0

file_modification_date: 2013-02-01 17:39:08.0

file_name: 3d5a457b30550f9d458dd535bf3c930d3fe5d034ca6359ba59348448089e03ec.pdf

file_pages_number: 20

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 2920674

245.1.0.b: Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses

Jüngel, Peter

Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM, publicado en Estudios de Cultura Maya, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Investigaciones Filológicas, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Jüngel, Peter (1991). Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses. Estudios de Cultura Maya; Vol. 18, 1991. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4123261

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Jüngel, Peter
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Mistakes and "Mistakes": to the Ambivalence of Mistakes. A Proof of Theses
Fecha
2013-02-05
Resumen
In my doctoral thesis (in prep.) I discuss in an appendix (title: Mistakes and "Mistakes": To the ambivalence of mistakes methodological problems at the example Codex Madrid 75-76 (orig. in German) whether a correction of mistakes can uncritically be done. This is done as an examplarian study of methods analysing mistakes at the example of the cartouche of day-signs (named thus by me) that is arranged around the central picture. (The correction itself isn"t affected or doubted). Taken a casual distribution of the mistakes there as decisive criterion, one finds facts that can"t be decided or are contradictory in tendency to the aim. At last, as result of case studies, it had to be concluded that the mistakes are intentional, set in directedly and can be interpreted without any contradiction in Codex Madrid (short: CM) as a reflex of the shift of yearbearers, and, second place, taken the numerical equivalents of the day-signs in the long-count, as a system grouping sidereal months. While there especially interested in the consequences in respect of the grades of complexity of texts and systems in Mesoamerican codices and Maya-inscriptions, a possible objection against result and election of CM 75-76 as object of study will be prooved on the soundness of its foundation. This objection might be formulated like this: The source CM 75-76 is because of faultyness and hasty of its drawing-style unreliable and therefore unfit for such an examination.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN impreso: 0185-2574; ISSN electrónico:2448-5179

Enlaces