dor_id: 38247

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista Anales de Antropología", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Citas Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, Publicaciones y Revistas Sociales y Humanísticas (CLASE); Ulrich’s, Open Access Map

561.#.#.u: http://www.iia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Ciencias Sociales y Económicas

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/antropologia/index

351.#.#.b: Anales de Antropología

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/antropologia/article/view/58690/51870

100.1.#.a: Sayyad, Alireza; Gilamirrod, Nahid; Sayyad, Amirhosein

524.#.#.a: Sayyad, Alireza, et al. (2017). Merging perspectives of learners: Corporeality, intersubjectivity and coexistence in art education. Anales de Antropología; Vol. 51 Núm. 1, 2017. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/38247

720.#.#.a: Sayyad, Alireza; Sayyad, Amirhosein; Gilamirrod, Nahid

245.1.0.a: Merging perspectives of learners: Corporeality, intersubjectivity and coexistence in art education

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2017

264.#.1.c: 2017-02-27

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico anantrop@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/antropologia/article/view/58690

001.#.#.#: 008.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/58690

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: Humiliation of body and feelings is deeply rooted in the philo- sophical tradition of the West. In Western history of philosophy, the body has always been under suspicion and the rational power has been considered as holding the responsibility of restraining and guiding one toward excellence. From the Ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Plato to modern philosophers such as Descartes, it was constantly stated in this tradition that real knowledge must be independent from physical perception and feelings, because sensual and emotional experiences distort the nature of reality. The view in Cartesian philosophy became an absolute and established form and left a profound impact on modern view on the priority of wisdom. For modern per- ception, also, the body used to be considered an unreliable and uncertain basis for recognition. The idea of thinking in mod- ern philosophy is coupled with Descartes’ well-known quote, “I think, therefore I am”. Descartes stated that to achieve the truth, bodily senses are not essentially required, and thus, he separated mind and body and divided them into two independent and dis- tinct elements. Descartes believed that human mind and wisdom are prior to physical feelings and desires, and the only way to achieve recognition and truth is to rely on mind without body, because body and physical senses might misguide the seeker in the way of recognition.

773.1.#.t: Anales de Antropología; Vol. 51 Núm. 1 (2017)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/antropologia/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2448-6221; ISSN impreso: 0185-1225

310.#.#.a: Semestral

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antro.2016.11.001

handle: 00987d123d715d35

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by

_deleted_conflicts: 2-bc90454960d7fe7b1f4561338f9c054c

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Merging perspectives of learners: Corporeality, intersubjectivity and coexistence in art education

Sayyad, Alireza; Gilamirrod, Nahid; Sayyad, Amirhosein

Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM, publicado en Anales de Antropología, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Investigaciones Antropológicas, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Sayyad, Alireza, et al. (2017). Merging perspectives of learners: Corporeality, intersubjectivity and coexistence in art education. Anales de Antropología; Vol. 51 Núm. 1, 2017. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/38247

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Sayyad, Alireza; Gilamirrod, Nahid; Sayyad, Amirhosein
Colaborador(es)
Sayyad, Alireza; Sayyad, Amirhosein; Gilamirrod, Nahid
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Ciencias Sociales y Económicas
Título
Merging perspectives of learners: Corporeality, intersubjectivity and coexistence in art education
Fecha
2017-02-27
Resumen
Humiliation of body and feelings is deeply rooted in the philo- sophical tradition of the West. In Western history of philosophy, the body has always been under suspicion and the rational power has been considered as holding the responsibility of restraining and guiding one toward excellence. From the Ancient Greek philosophers such as Socrates and Plato to modern philosophers such as Descartes, it was constantly stated in this tradition that real knowledge must be independent from physical perception and feelings, because sensual and emotional experiences distort the nature of reality. The view in Cartesian philosophy became an absolute and established form and left a profound impact on modern view on the priority of wisdom. For modern per- ception, also, the body used to be considered an unreliable and uncertain basis for recognition. The idea of thinking in mod- ern philosophy is coupled with Descartes’ well-known quote, “I think, therefore I am”. Descartes stated that to achieve the truth, bodily senses are not essentially required, and thus, he separated mind and body and divided them into two independent and dis- tinct elements. Descartes believed that human mind and wisdom are prior to physical feelings and desires, and the only way to achieve recognition and truth is to rely on mind without body, because body and physical senses might misguide the seeker in the way of recognition.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2448-6221; ISSN impreso: 0185-1225

Enlaces