dor_id: 43013

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: si

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/25825/24320

100.1.#.a: Rios Szalay, Enrique; Barceló Santana, Federico; Juárez García, Adriana

524.#.#.a: Rios Szalay, Enrique, et al. (2011). Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage comparison between two Zirconia Oxide systems with the same cement. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 15, No 2-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43013

245.1.0.a: Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage comparison between two Zirconia Oxide systems with the same cement

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2011

264.#.1.c: 2011-06-22

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2011-06-22, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/25825

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Goal: To compare the marginal fit and micro-leakage of Lava™ and Zirkon zahn® copings using the same cement as adhesive. Materials and Methods: Twenty extracted superior premolars were divided into two groups. Teeth in the first group were prepared to receive Lava™ copings, while teeth in the second group were prepared for Zirkon zahn® copings. Copings were prepared following each system´s standard procedure. Marginal fit was measured in micrometers in eight different regions, both before and after being bound with RelyX™ U100 cement. Once thermocycled, samples were soaked in 2% fuchsin dye solution and buccolingually sliced, microleakage was measured, both in the vestibular and palatal regions. Results: A statistically significant difference in marginal fit between the two zirconia systems was found. Lava™ registered the best adaptation values: 19.7µm before cementation and 15.0µm after, while Zirkon zahn® reported marginal fit values of 28.1µm (before) and 22.8µm (after cementation). In contrast, we found no significant difference in microleakage: Lava™ averaged 314.2µm and Zirkon zahn® 319.8µm. Conclusion: Lava™ registered better marginal fit values than Zirkon zahn®, but no significant difference in microleakage. Key Words: Marginal fit, microleakage, zirconia, CAD-CAM.

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 15, No 2-ING

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/index

handle: 00ee6054171a6b36

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-33e6b78534fe47b6086ed6b34a48ab97

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage comparison between two Zirconia Oxide systems with the same cement

Rios Szalay, Enrique; Barceló Santana, Federico; Juárez García, Adriana

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Rios Szalay, Enrique, et al. (2011). Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage comparison between two Zirconia Oxide systems with the same cement. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 15, No 2-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43013

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Rios Szalay, Enrique; Barceló Santana, Federico; Juárez García, Adriana
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage comparison between two Zirconia Oxide systems with the same cement
Fecha
2011-06-22
Resumen
Goal: To compare the marginal fit and micro-leakage of Lava™ and Zirkon zahn® copings using the same cement as adhesive. Materials and Methods: Twenty extracted superior premolars were divided into two groups. Teeth in the first group were prepared to receive Lava™ copings, while teeth in the second group were prepared for Zirkon zahn® copings. Copings were prepared following each system´s standard procedure. Marginal fit was measured in micrometers in eight different regions, both before and after being bound with RelyX™ U100 cement. Once thermocycled, samples were soaked in 2% fuchsin dye solution and buccolingually sliced, microleakage was measured, both in the vestibular and palatal regions. Results: A statistically significant difference in marginal fit between the two zirconia systems was found. Lava™ registered the best adaptation values: 19.7µm before cementation and 15.0µm after, while Zirkon zahn® reported marginal fit values of 28.1µm (before) and 22.8µm (after cementation). In contrast, we found no significant difference in microleakage: Lava™ averaged 314.2µm and Zirkon zahn® 319.8µm. Conclusion: Lava™ registered better marginal fit values than Zirkon zahn®, but no significant difference in microleakage. Key Words: Marginal fit, microleakage, zirconia, CAD-CAM.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces