dor_id: 4115201

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/811/781

100.1.#.a: Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C. A.; Vernengo, Roberto J.

524.#.#.a: Puga, Leila Z., et al. (1991). Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 23 Núm. 69, 1991; 27-59. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115201

245.1.0.a: Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1991

264.#.1.c: 2018-12-13

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/811

001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/811

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The relationships between moral and legal codes, that is, between specific normative sets, is a traditional problem of ethics, politics and law philosophy. Deontic logics have provided some instruments for a deeper analysis of those relations. The authors try to analyze the logical consequences of the adoption of different axiomaticallogical systems, where deontic modalities are introduced as expressing different senses of moral or legal obligation, prohibition, permission, etc. It tums out, as a result of the analysis , that sorne very traditional thesis about the relationships between law and moral presuppose different logical requirements, some of which are not only interesting from a pure formal point of view, but also as an essay in a rational analysis of normative discourse. Different types of logics, specially sorne called bidimensional deontic systems, are investigated, as sorne mixed alethic-deontic and paraconsistent systems are sketched, Contraintuitive consequences and paradoxes deriving Crom those logical presuppositions are described and their consequences in ethical thinking are underlined. The paper" s purpose is to attain a better understanding of sorne informal ethical notions through the construction of formal systems expressing with sorne precision the very vague notions that sometimes are behind accepted legal or moral conceptions. Thus, the authors think, it would be possible a progressive aproximation to a better analysis of sorne important presuppositions of ethical discourse, a discourse where morals and law have an essential part to play. [Roberto Vemengo]

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 23 Núm. 69 (1991); 27-59

773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 27-59

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1991.811

handle: 705b4ea00ec1aee7

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2010-10-22 18:07:23.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-27 01:13:06.0

file_creator: Claudia Chavez

file_name: d9a2e297000df8f37a66ed54c84571b96162bda1a352a250fe83ccf7dee52f93.pdf

file_pages_number: 33

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.5

file_size: 349444

245.1.0.b: Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho

Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C. A.; Vernengo, Roberto J.

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Puga, Leila Z., et al. (1991). Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 23 Núm. 69, 1991; 27-59. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115201

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Puga, Leila Z.; Da Costa, Newton C. A.; Vernengo, Roberto J.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Lógicas normativas, moral y derecho
Fecha
2018-12-13
Resumen
The relationships between moral and legal codes, that is, between specific normative sets, is a traditional problem of ethics, politics and law philosophy. Deontic logics have provided some instruments for a deeper analysis of those relations. The authors try to analyze the logical consequences of the adoption of different axiomaticallogical systems, where deontic modalities are introduced as expressing different senses of moral or legal obligation, prohibition, permission, etc. It tums out, as a result of the analysis , that sorne very traditional thesis about the relationships between law and moral presuppose different logical requirements, some of which are not only interesting from a pure formal point of view, but also as an essay in a rational analysis of normative discourse. Different types of logics, specially sorne called bidimensional deontic systems, are investigated, as sorne mixed alethic-deontic and paraconsistent systems are sketched, Contraintuitive consequences and paradoxes deriving Crom those logical presuppositions are described and their consequences in ethical thinking are underlined. The paper" s purpose is to attain a better understanding of sorne informal ethical notions through the construction of formal systems expressing with sorne precision the very vague notions that sometimes are behind accepted legal or moral conceptions. Thus, the authors think, it would be possible a progressive aproximation to a better analysis of sorne important presuppositions of ethical discourse, a discourse where morals and law have an essential part to play. [Roberto Vemengo]
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces