dor_id: 4146799

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/68833/62028

100.1.#.a: Bautista, Luis M.; Martín, Beatriz

524.#.#.a: Bautista, Luis M., et al. (2018). Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4146799

245.1.0.a: Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2018

264.#.1.c: 2018-12-01

653.#.#.a: weak Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma; Tit-for-Tat; foraging games; reciprocity; Periparus ater

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/68833

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/68833

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: Foraging tests of the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD) show animals defect, contrary to evolutionary models that predict cooperative animals will prevail and spread in populations. This contradiction could be due to IPD rules that could be too challenging to understand for most animals. We explored this hypothesis relaxing the payoff matrix of the IPD (T>R>P>S=0) to a weak payoff-matrix (T=R>P=S>0) and tested it with coal tits, which did not play one another; rather, each one played against a computer programmed to deliver food pellets according to the ‘Tit for Tat’ strategy. Despite the IPD was programmed with a weak payoff matrix, coal tits preferences to defect increased a 10% when playing the Game condition as compared to a previous Control condition. In the Control condition they foraged at random (48±11%) between two pellet dispensers that delivered food rewards at the same rate, while in the Game condition they increased the preference towards the defection option (58±10%). A sequential (trial by trial) analysis showed that these small birds defected regularly and cooperated at random.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 (2018)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v44.i2.68833

handle: 57d687b6f99fcab0

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:10:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2019-05-03 17:37:17.0

file_modification_date: 2019-05-03 17:37:21.0

file_name: 2e1d0a3b805514ebd750470b3f0f13f81bd046b4c7fa41a115c109172bc4c399.pdf

file_pages_number: 27

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 1889978

245.1.0.b: Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:10:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game

Bautista, Luis M.; Martín, Beatriz

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Bautista, Luis M., et al. (2018). Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 44 Núm. 2 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4146799

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Bautista, Luis M.; Martín, Beatriz
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Learning and reciprocity in coal tits playing the Prisoner’s Dilemma Game
Fecha
2018-12-01
Resumen
Foraging tests of the Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma (IPD) show animals defect, contrary to evolutionary models that predict cooperative animals will prevail and spread in populations. This contradiction could be due to IPD rules that could be too challenging to understand for most animals. We explored this hypothesis relaxing the payoff matrix of the IPD (T>R>P>S=0) to a weak payoff-matrix (T=R>P=S>0) and tested it with coal tits, which did not play one another; rather, each one played against a computer programmed to deliver food pellets according to the ‘Tit for Tat’ strategy. Despite the IPD was programmed with a weak payoff matrix, coal tits preferences to defect increased a 10% when playing the Game condition as compared to a previous Control condition. In the Control condition they foraged at random (48±11%) between two pellet dispensers that delivered food rewards at the same rate, while in the Game condition they increased the preference towards the defection option (58±10%). A sequential (trial by trial) analysis showed that these small birds defected regularly and cooperated at random.
Tema
weak Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma; Tit-for-Tat; foraging games; reciprocity; Periparus ater
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces