dor_id: 4115171

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.34

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/427/414

100.1.#.a: Ezquerro, Jesús; Martínez Manrique, Fernando

524.#.#.a: Ezquerro, Jesús, et al. (2004). Intertheory Relations in Cognitive Science: Privileged Levels and Reductive Strategies. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 106, 2004; 55 - 103. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115171

245.1.0.a: Intertheory Relations in Cognitive Science: Privileged Levels and Reductive Strategies

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2004

264.#.1.c: 2018-11-28

653.#.#.a: cognitive science; computationalism; connectionism; reduction; ciencia cognitiva; computacionalismo; conexionismo; reducción

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico critica.ojs@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/427

001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/427

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Research in cognitive science has often assumed the existence of a privileged level that unifies theoretical explanations arising from different disciplines. Philosophical accounts differ about the locus of those intertheory relations. In this paper, four different views are analyzed: classical, connectionist, pragmatist, and reductionist, as exemplified in the works of von Eckardt, Horgan and Tienson, Hardcastle, and Bickle, respectively. Their divergences are characterized in terms of the possibility of such a privileged level. The classical view favors a privileged computational level. The connectionist revision tries to draw biological intuitions into computational models to provide a link between neuronsand computations. The pragmatist approach rejects the idea of a privileged level and offers a more eclectic view of cognitive theory building. The reductionist account pursues theoretical unification by means of the reduction of higher level theories to basic level (biological) ones.

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 106 (2004); 55 - 103

773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 55 - 103

599.#.#.a: 34

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2004.427

harvesting_date: 2024-02-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2005-05-13 01:38:51.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-23 02:18:09.0

file_name: fd112f3860f24dfae7476c7cd976567d06c01022bc9730d46ab8349b0e247238.pdf

file_pages_number: 49

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 222124

last_modified: 2025-02-11 13:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Intertheory Relations in Cognitive Science: Privileged Levels and Reductive Strategies

Ezquerro, Jesús; Martínez Manrique, Fernando

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Ezquerro, Jesús, et al. (2004). Intertheory Relations in Cognitive Science: Privileged Levels and Reductive Strategies. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 106, 2004; 55 - 103. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115171

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Ezquerro, Jesús; Martínez Manrique, Fernando
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Intertheory Relations in Cognitive Science: Privileged Levels and Reductive Strategies
Fecha
2018-11-28
Resumen
Research in cognitive science has often assumed the existence of a privileged level that unifies theoretical explanations arising from different disciplines. Philosophical accounts differ about the locus of those intertheory relations. In this paper, four different views are analyzed: classical, connectionist, pragmatist, and reductionist, as exemplified in the works of von Eckardt, Horgan and Tienson, Hardcastle, and Bickle, respectively. Their divergences are characterized in terms of the possibility of such a privileged level. The classical view favors a privileged computational level. The connectionist revision tries to draw biological intuitions into computational models to provide a link between neuronsand computations. The pragmatist approach rejects the idea of a privileged level and offers a more eclectic view of cognitive theory building. The reductionist account pursues theoretical unification by means of the reduction of higher level theories to basic level (biological) ones.
Tema
cognitive science; computationalism; connectionism; reduction; ciencia cognitiva; computacionalismo; conexionismo; reducción
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces