La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistainvestedu@gmail.com.
Ver términos de la licenciaNavarro H., Nancy, et al. (2018). Evaluation role of tutors: comparison of perception students of the Health Careers. Investigación en Educación Médica; Vol. 7 Núm. 25, 2018: Investigación en Educación Médica; 10-17. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4118455
Autor(es)
Navarro H., Nancy; Zamora S., José
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Evaluation role of tutors: comparison of perception students of the Health Careers
Fecha
2018-01-01
Resumen
Objective: To compare the performance of tutors in different curricular levels of Health ;Careers, from the student perspective. Method: Descriptive cross-sectional quantitative research was carried out. The population corresponded to students of Nursing, Kinesiology, Medicine, Nutrition, Obstetrics, ; Medical Technology, ;with experience in PBL of different curricular levels. A questionaire of 23-ítems, grouped into three factors: tutor tasks; methodological domain / attitudinal aspect; learning environment ;( Cronbach 0.91), was applied to 1.541 students with prior informed consent. A Likert scale (1 to 5) was used for the responses. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed, comparison of means with Scheffe’s test. Results: In factor I, items with lower means are concentrated in all curricular levels: It stimulates self-evaluation and peer evaluation of students; Helps develop individual communication ;skills in students. In factor II the item with lower mean was demonstrates responsibility in tutorial process and greater; demonstrates commitment in its role of ; autor. The factor III corresponds to the best evaluated of the instrument, the greater means were stimulates the good relations between students; It manages to create an atmosphere of trust and respect in the ;tutorial. Factor I has a significant difference (p < 0.05) between first level and clinical (p.002), the factor II between the first and preclinical levels (p.002); first level and clinical (p .000). Factor III shows differences between first level and clinical (p.000) and preclinical and clinical (p .027).
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2007-5057; ISSN impreso: 2007-865X
