dor_id: 4133084

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Geofísica Internacional", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Dialnet, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Geobase

561.#.#.u: https://www.geofisica.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

351.#.#.b: Geofísica Internacional

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/736/715

100.1.#.a: Seluchi, Marcelo E.; Chou, Sin Chan

524.#.#.a: Seluchi, Marcelo E., et al. (2001). Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 40 Núm. 3: Julio 1, 2001; 219-237. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4133084

245.1.0.a: Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2001

264.#.1.c: 2001-07-01

653.#.#.a: Meteorología; modelado regional; desempeño; procesos superficiales; Sudamérica; Meteorology; regional modeling; performance; surface processes; South America

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistagi@igeofisica.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/736

001.#.#.#: 063.oai:revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx:article/736

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: A comparison of performance of two versions of the Eta/CPTEC model is presented. The new version is an update of an earlier operational one and includes representation of soil and vegetation types. The soil/vegetation model contains two under- ground layers and a canopy layer. Evaluation was carried out by comparing the mean and root mean square errors of several variables for an ensemble of 15 meteorological situations, using the NCEP analyses, upper air soundings and precipitation data over South America. Precipitation forecasts were evaluated by the equitable threat score (ETS) and the bias score (BIAS).The mean errors from both versions show similarities during the first 24 hours of forecast, but surface temperature is more accurately predicted by the updated model. After 48 hours, temperature and humidity forecasts show better skill in the new version too. Over subtropical South America differences are more evident in temperature and humidity, less so for geopotential heights and practically nonexistent for horizontal winds. The precipitation forecasts for the updated version have equitable threat scores slightly higher and similar bias scores during the first 24 hours. After 48 hours this version tends to overestimate the rainfall, while its spatial distribution remains unaffected.doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2001.40.3.324

773.1.#.t: Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 40 Núm. 3: Julio 1, 2001; 219-237

773.1.#.o: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

022.#.#.a: ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 219-237

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2001.40.3.324

handle: 679a443b506c9aa0

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2001-11-13 12:22:54.0

file_modification_date: 2022-07-14 15:37:44.0

file_creator: Marcelo E. Seluchi and Sin Chan Chou

file_name: 966bf163179ffea4ca3e4b99840448279725ea8c13262a5866c47d3a7769b791.pdf

file_pages_number: 19

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 467134

245.1.0.b: Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-sa

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America

Seluchi, Marcelo E.; Chou, Sin Chan

Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM, publicado en Geofísica Internacional, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Seluchi, Marcelo E., et al. (2001). Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 40 Núm. 3: Julio 1, 2001; 219-237. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4133084

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Seluchi, Marcelo E.; Chou, Sin Chan
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra
Título
Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over South America
Fecha
2001-07-01
Resumen
A comparison of performance of two versions of the Eta/CPTEC model is presented. The new version is an update of an earlier operational one and includes representation of soil and vegetation types. The soil/vegetation model contains two under- ground layers and a canopy layer. Evaluation was carried out by comparing the mean and root mean square errors of several variables for an ensemble of 15 meteorological situations, using the NCEP analyses, upper air soundings and precipitation data over South America. Precipitation forecasts were evaluated by the equitable threat score (ETS) and the bias score (BIAS).The mean errors from both versions show similarities during the first 24 hours of forecast, but surface temperature is more accurately predicted by the updated model. After 48 hours, temperature and humidity forecasts show better skill in the new version too. Over subtropical South America differences are more evident in temperature and humidity, less so for geopotential heights and practically nonexistent for horizontal winds. The precipitation forecasts for the updated version have equitable threat scores slightly higher and similar bias scores during the first 24 hours. After 48 hours this version tends to overestimate the rainfall, while its spatial distribution remains unaffected.doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2001.40.3.324
Tema
Meteorología; modelado regional; desempeño; procesos superficiales; Sudamérica; Meteorology; regional modeling; performance; surface processes; South America
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

Enlaces