dor_id: 4111649

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/75562/67470

100.1.#.a: Lambert, Joseph M.; Bloom, Sarah E.; Nickerson, Cicely M.; Clay, Casey J.; Samaha, Andrew L.

524.#.#.a: Lambert, Joseph M., et al. (2019). Evaluating Functional Differences Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement Through Preference for Parameters of Sound Manipulation. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 2019. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111649

245.1.0.a: Evaluating Functional Differences Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement Through Preference for Parameters of Sound Manipulation

502.#.#.c: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

561.1.#.a: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

264.#.0.c: 2019

264.#.1.c: 2019-12-01

653.#.#.a: Choice; concurrent operant; negative reinforcement; parameters of reinforcement; humans.

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2019-12-01, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/75562

001.#.#.#: oai:ojs.phoenicis.tic.unam.mx:article/75562

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: The present experiment examined whether identical manipulations of identical parameters of positive and negative sound reinforcement influenced human response allocation in different ways. three undergraduate students participated. progressive-ratio schedules were used to identify preferred and aversive sounds the contingent presentation (or removal) of which had similar reinforcing values. these reinforcers then were incorporated into concurrent-operant parameter sensitivity assessments (psas) to evaluate whether participant sensitivity to dimensions of certain parameters (i.e., rate, magnitude, delay) differed across positive and negative reinforcement procedures. sensitivity was identical across the two procedures for two participants, but not for the third. these results demonstrate positive-reinforcement psas do not always predict differential sensitivity to parametric manipulations of negative reinforcement. the implication, that positive and negative processes can have functionally distinct effects, is discussed.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 (2019)

773.1.#.o: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

046.#.#.j: 2021-05-27 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

758.#.#.1: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v45.i2.75562

handle: 0084a48872afca93

harvesting_date: 2021-04-09 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2020-07-14 00:05:22.0

file_modification_date: 2020-07-14 00:05:25.0

file_name: 0a3339f4dc87276c20a285413e86fe60ba7237ffb124656dc1cd731dca001728.pdf

file_pages_number: 26

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 269588

last_modified: 2021-06-30 20:30:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Evaluating Functional Differences Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement Through Preference for Parameters of Sound Manipulation

Lambert, Joseph M.; Bloom, Sarah E.; Nickerson, Cicely M.; Clay, Casey J.; Samaha, Andrew L.

Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Lambert, Joseph M., et al. (2019). Evaluating Functional Differences Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement Through Preference for Parameters of Sound Manipulation. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 2019. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111649

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Lambert, Joseph M.; Bloom, Sarah E.; Nickerson, Cicely M.; Clay, Casey J.; Samaha, Andrew L.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Evaluating Functional Differences Between Positive and Negative Reinforcement Through Preference for Parameters of Sound Manipulation
Fecha
2019-12-01
Resumen
The present experiment examined whether identical manipulations of identical parameters of positive and negative sound reinforcement influenced human response allocation in different ways. three undergraduate students participated. progressive-ratio schedules were used to identify preferred and aversive sounds the contingent presentation (or removal) of which had similar reinforcing values. these reinforcers then were incorporated into concurrent-operant parameter sensitivity assessments (psas) to evaluate whether participant sensitivity to dimensions of certain parameters (i.e., rate, magnitude, delay) differed across positive and negative reinforcement procedures. sensitivity was identical across the two procedures for two participants, but not for the third. these results demonstrate positive-reinforcement psas do not always predict differential sensitivity to parametric manipulations of negative reinforcement. the implication, that positive and negative processes can have functionally distinct effects, is discussed.
Tema
Choice; concurrent operant; negative reinforcement; parameters of reinforcement; humans.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces