dor_id: 4137201

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única. Los revisores son externos nacionales e internacionales

510.0.#.a: Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)

561.#.#.u: http://www.filos.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria

351.#.#.b: Theoría. Revista del Colegio de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria/article/view/334/2110

100.1.#.a: Silva, Carmen

524.#.#.a: Silva, Carmen (2007). Escepticismo, mecanicismo, teología y alquimia en Robert Boyle. Theoría. Revista del Colegio de Filosofía; Núm. 18, 2007; 11-23. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4137201

245.1.0.a: Escepticismo, mecanicismo, teología y alquimia en Robert Boyle

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2007

264.#.1.c: 2007-07-01

653.#.#.a: Naturaleza del mecanicismo; Atomismo y mecanicismo; Alquimia; Atomismo; Mecanicismo

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revista.theoria@filos.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria/article/view/334

001.#.#.#: 125.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/334

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The purpose of this article is to approach to the nature of Robert Boyle´s mechanicism and in this way be able to appreciate how this thesis or explanatory model, i.e. the mechanicism, which was fundamental for the philosophers of the XVII century, had important differences among its defenders. In other words, the hypothesis I want to suggest in this work is that mechanicism was, on the one hand, an efficient form to confront aristotelism and to approach to the natural world and, on the other, that in each author of that period we find variations of what each natural philosopher considered mechanicism. It appears to me that in Boyle we can find the following features that define his mechanicism and therefore his natural philosophy; and that he shares some of them with other contemporary philosophers of nature and not others, since in the natural philosophy of each of the authors we can find a distinct form of dealing with the pirronic skepticism, which will result in a specific epistemology and, therefore, both natural philosophy and epistemology were linked in a given theological perspective. In short, that the different combinations of the distinct epistemic as well as theological postures resulted in a specific natural philosophy. In other words, in this work I intend to illustrate all this by exposing some of the epistemic and theological elements that compose the natural philosophy of Robert Boyle and, therefore, approach to the nature of his mechanicism.

773.1.#.t: Theoría. Revista del Colegio de Filosofía; Núm. 18 (2007); 11-23

773.1.#.o: https://revistas.filos.unam.mx/index.php/theoria

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2954-4270; ISSN impreso: 1665-6415

310.#.#.a: Semestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 11-23

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/ffyl.16656415p.2007.18.334

harvesting_date: 2023-11-08 13:10:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2021-11-05 11:09:44.0

file_name: ae725069a81cf0040c359922ae1a749ebf766f0be6cabc047343e799628af139.pdf

file_pages_number: 13

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.7

file_size: 124277

last_modified: 2024-03-19 14:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Escepticismo, mecanicismo, teología y alquimia en Robert Boyle

Silva, Carmen

Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, UNAM, publicado en Theoría. Revista del Colegio de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Silva, Carmen (2007). Escepticismo, mecanicismo, teología y alquimia en Robert Boyle. Theoría. Revista del Colegio de Filosofía; Núm. 18, 2007; 11-23. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4137201

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Silva, Carmen
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Escepticismo, mecanicismo, teología y alquimia en Robert Boyle
Fecha
2007-07-01
Resumen
The purpose of this article is to approach to the nature of Robert Boyle´s mechanicism and in this way be able to appreciate how this thesis or explanatory model, i.e. the mechanicism, which was fundamental for the philosophers of the XVII century, had important differences among its defenders. In other words, the hypothesis I want to suggest in this work is that mechanicism was, on the one hand, an efficient form to confront aristotelism and to approach to the natural world and, on the other, that in each author of that period we find variations of what each natural philosopher considered mechanicism. It appears to me that in Boyle we can find the following features that define his mechanicism and therefore his natural philosophy; and that he shares some of them with other contemporary philosophers of nature and not others, since in the natural philosophy of each of the authors we can find a distinct form of dealing with the pirronic skepticism, which will result in a specific epistemology and, therefore, both natural philosophy and epistemology were linked in a given theological perspective. In short, that the different combinations of the distinct epistemic as well as theological postures resulted in a specific natural philosophy. In other words, in this work I intend to illustrate all this by exposing some of the epistemic and theological elements that compose the natural philosophy of Robert Boyle and, therefore, approach to the nature of his mechanicism.
Tema
Naturaleza del mecanicismo; Atomismo y mecanicismo; Alquimia; Atomismo; Mecanicismo
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2954-4270; ISSN impreso: 1665-6415

Enlaces