dor_id: 4115658

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/745/718

100.1.#.a: Maliandi, Ricardo

524.#.#.a: Maliandi, Ricardo (1990). El trilema de Aristófanes y los presupuestos normativos del diálogo crítico. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 65, 1990; 43-55. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115658

245.1.0.a: El trilema de Aristófanes y los presupuestos normativos del diálogo crítico

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1990

264.#.1.c: 2018-12-13

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/745

001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/745

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: It is proposed to call “critical dialogue” to a sort of discussion, whose description must be made in terms of the opposition between the speakers subjected to the opposition between the argument, which is developed in the dialogue, and to the difficulty, which is attempted to be solved by means of that argument. So the critical dialogue is characterized by a tendency to unify the argumentative instance; this gives it a reflexive mark. This mark is also showed by another peculiarity of the dialogue, it contains the necessary explanation of its own methodology and logic: the critical dialogue is, partially, a reflection about itself. The critical dialogue excludes both the dogmatical positions and the skeptical ones, for the first ones remain submerged in monological proceedings, and the second ones have to face the trilemma: they must 1) avoid judging, or 2) commit performative self contradiction, or 3) try to make fun of the other speaker (as it is made by Aristophanes with Socrates in The Clouds). In all these cases the dialogue is interrupted. The critical dialogue takes for granted not only the validity of the norm which claims that a consensus ought to be reached through the dialogue, but (as every factical consensus is only about some sides of a question in discussion) the validity of the norm, which claims that, in principle the dialogue must always go on. [R.M.]

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 65 (1990); 43-55

773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 43-55

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1990.745

handle: 00f7d5f99ea02bc3

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2010-10-08 21:57:48.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-29 19:33:59.0

file_creator: IIFs

file_name: 101859bdea7a5c6aa4f3f8f4eb433ae99466970f5f9ba2eeabc0a9563b92baa9.pdf

file_pages_number: 13

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 187612

245.1.0.b: Aristophanes" Trilemma and the Normative Assumptions of the Critical Dialogue

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

El trilema de Aristófanes y los presupuestos normativos del diálogo crítico

Maliandi, Ricardo

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Maliandi, Ricardo (1990). El trilema de Aristófanes y los presupuestos normativos del diálogo crítico. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 22 Núm. 65, 1990; 43-55. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115658

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Maliandi, Ricardo
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
El trilema de Aristófanes y los presupuestos normativos del diálogo crítico
Fecha
2018-12-13
Resumen
It is proposed to call “critical dialogue” to a sort of discussion, whose description must be made in terms of the opposition between the speakers subjected to the opposition between the argument, which is developed in the dialogue, and to the difficulty, which is attempted to be solved by means of that argument. So the critical dialogue is characterized by a tendency to unify the argumentative instance; this gives it a reflexive mark. This mark is also showed by another peculiarity of the dialogue, it contains the necessary explanation of its own methodology and logic: the critical dialogue is, partially, a reflection about itself. The critical dialogue excludes both the dogmatical positions and the skeptical ones, for the first ones remain submerged in monological proceedings, and the second ones have to face the trilemma: they must 1) avoid judging, or 2) commit performative self contradiction, or 3) try to make fun of the other speaker (as it is made by Aristophanes with Socrates in The Clouds). In all these cases the dialogue is interrupted. The critical dialogue takes for granted not only the validity of the norm which claims that a consensus ought to be reached through the dialogue, but (as every factical consensus is only about some sides of a question in discussion) the validity of the norm, which claims that, in principle the dialogue must always go on. [R.M.]
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces