dor_id: 4118452

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Investigación en Educación Médica", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Periódica, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); Banco de Datos sobre Educación (Iresie); La Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina y el Caribe, España y Portugal (RedALyC); Imbiomed

561.#.#.u: http://www.facmed.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://riem.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/riem

351.#.#.b: Investigación en Educación Médica

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.72

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://riem.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/riem/article/view/417/384

100.1.#.a: Jurado-núñez, Alma; Flores-hernández, Fernando; Delgado-maldonado, Laura; Sommer-cervantes, Hermann; Martínez-gonzález, Adrián; Sánchez- Mendiola, Melchor

524.#.#.a: Jurado-núñez, Alma, et al. (2013). Distractors in multiple-choice questions for medical students: a descriptive analysis in a high-stakes summative exam. Investigación en Educación Médica; Vol. 2 Núm. 8, 2013: Investigación en Educación Médica; 202-210. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4118452

245.1.0.a: Distractors in multiple-choice questions for medical students: a descriptive analysis in a high-stakes summative exam

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Medicina, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2013

264.#.1.c: 2013-01-01

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistainvestedu@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://riem.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/riem/article/view/417

001.#.#.#: 072.oai:ojs2.132.248.204.81:article/417

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: Introduction: Multiple-choice question (MCQ) exams are the most frequently used tool for knowledge assessment of medical students. It has been shown that three options in each item are enough; however, many tests in our country still use questions with five options. The study of non-functional distractors (NFD) is needed in order to improve the quality of our assessment instruments. Objective: To identify NFD and their behavior in a high-stakes summative exam in medical students. Method: A psychometric analysis was performed of the Theoretical Professional Exam at UNAM Faculty of Medicine, the 2008 version. Difficulty, discrimination and point-biserial correlation were calculated for each item and its four distractors. The frequency of items with zero to four NFD was obtained, and the differences of NFD per item and their psychometric characteristics were assessed. The psychometric behavior of the whole exam was compared to a version where items with four NFD were removed. Results: The test had 420 MCQ items with five options, and was answered by 882 students. The instrument had a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.93. Of the 1 680 distractors evaluated, only 788 (46.9%) were functional. More than two-thirds of the total of items had two or more NFD. There was an average of 2.12 ± 0.99 NFD per item, the majority of which were chosen by less than 5% of the test takers. With higher quantity of NFD, the items’ difficulty index was higher and the discrimination index was lower. Conclusions: Items with two functional distractors were the majority in the exam. Two plausible distractors are a reasonable alternative for item development, maintaining or improving the reliability and psychometric profile of these types of tests.

773.1.#.t: Investigación en Educación Médica; Vol. 2 Núm. 8 (2013): Investigación en Educación Médica; 202-210

773.1.#.o: http://riem.facmed.unam.mx/index.php/riem

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2007-5057; ISSN impreso: 2007-865X

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 202-210

599.#.#.a: 72

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Medicina, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/fm.20075057e.2013.08.00005

harvesting_date: 2024-02-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2013-09-17 15:35:35.0

file_modification_date: 2013-10-14 22:22:09.0

file_name: e7670524fffd4d45599bccfe991ad7470e234d3b152b1755bf1c1ce3c9daba30.pdf

file_pages_number: 9

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.5

file_size: 411770

last_modified: 2024-02-23 00:00:08

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2