dor_id: 4161129

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.109

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/90354/79063

100.1.#.a: Cynthia Contreras Garza; Nora Edith Rangel Bernal; Gerardo Alfonso Ortiz Rueda

524.#.#.a: Cynthia Contreras Garza, et al. (2024). Delegación de autoridad y correspondencia pedir-hacer del delegado en el cumplimiento de estudiantes universitarios. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 50 Núm. 2, 2024. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4161129

245.1.0.a: Delegación de autoridad y correspondencia pedir-hacer del delegado en el cumplimiento de estudiantes universitarios

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2024

264.#.1.c: 2024-11-28

653.#.#.a: power; authority; delegation; correspondence asking/doing; poder; autoridad; delegación; correspondencia pedir-hacer

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/90354

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/90354

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: Different ways of delegating authority to one of the participants in a group of university students were compared. The influence that the delegate"s behavior had on the compliance of the rest of the participants was also analyzed -whether or not the delegate was acting in correspondence with the request that he made during the sessions. A puzzle-assembly task was used, and 32 university students were randomly divided into eight groups exposed to different experimental conditions. After training in authority phase and two diagnostic conditions, groups 1 and 1A, were exposed to a condition in which the experimenter explicitly delegated authority; in groups 2 and 2A, authority was delegated by the group; in groups 3 and 3A, authority was self-delegated; while in groups 4 and 4A, authority was not delegated. Groups 1 to 4 were exposed to correspondence in the delegate"s actions concerning his request to the group members, while groups 1A, 2A, 3A, and 4A were exposed to a non-correspondence condition. Results showed that participants in the explicit delegation groups (by the experimenter or by the group) performed more compliance responses. In contrast, participants in the non-delegation groups performed these behaviors in fewer numbers.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 50 Núm. 2 (2024)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

599.#.#.a: 109

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v50.i2.90354

harvesting_date: 2025-01-07 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_name: 1deed9ac0400cc7a31b67dc7e832c01d25d27eb2261d4abcc709572a429434b2.pdf

file_pages_number: 23

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.7

file_size: 4888734

245.1.0.b: Delegation of authority and ask-do correspondence of the delegate in the compliance of university students

last_modified: 2025-01-07 00:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Delegación de autoridad y correspondencia pedir-hacer del delegado en el cumplimiento de estudiantes universitarios

Cynthia Contreras Garza; Nora Edith Rangel Bernal; Gerardo Alfonso Ortiz Rueda

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Cynthia Contreras Garza, et al. (2024). Delegación de autoridad y correspondencia pedir-hacer del delegado en el cumplimiento de estudiantes universitarios. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 50 Núm. 2, 2024. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4161129

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Cynthia Contreras Garza; Nora Edith Rangel Bernal; Gerardo Alfonso Ortiz Rueda
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Delegación de autoridad y correspondencia pedir-hacer del delegado en el cumplimiento de estudiantes universitarios
Fecha
2024-11-28
Resumen
Different ways of delegating authority to one of the participants in a group of university students were compared. The influence that the delegate"s behavior had on the compliance of the rest of the participants was also analyzed -whether or not the delegate was acting in correspondence with the request that he made during the sessions. A puzzle-assembly task was used, and 32 university students were randomly divided into eight groups exposed to different experimental conditions. After training in authority phase and two diagnostic conditions, groups 1 and 1A, were exposed to a condition in which the experimenter explicitly delegated authority; in groups 2 and 2A, authority was delegated by the group; in groups 3 and 3A, authority was self-delegated; while in groups 4 and 4A, authority was not delegated. Groups 1 to 4 were exposed to correspondence in the delegate"s actions concerning his request to the group members, while groups 1A, 2A, 3A, and 4A were exposed to a non-correspondence condition. Results showed that participants in the explicit delegation groups (by the experimenter or by the group) performed more compliance responses. In contrast, participants in the non-delegation groups performed these behaviors in fewer numbers.
Tema
power; authority; delegation; correspondence asking/doing; poder; autoridad; delegación; correspondencia pedir-hacer
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces