dor_id: 4115637

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única. Los revisores son externos nacionales e internacionales.

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus), Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR), The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: http://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/286/279

100.1.#.a: Schmill Ordóñez, Ulises

524.#.#.a: Schmill Ordóñez, Ulises (1978). Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 10 No 30, 1978; 55-79. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115637

245.1.0.a: Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1978

264.#.1.c: 2018-11-08

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2018-11-08, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/286

001.#.#.#: critica:oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/286

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The purpose of this paper is the analysis of the essay “Law and Logic” by Hans Kelsen, especially his attitude about the logical principles of non-contradiction and what he calls the “inference rule” as not applicable to the law, even in the case of the conflict of norms. With this in mind the thesis that the norm is the sense of an act of will and is, therefore, neither true nor false, is analysed. Kelsen also maintains that only statements which have the sense of an act of thought are either true or false. It is held that these theses make no sense because no rational meaning can be given to the expressions ‘act of thought’ and ‘act of will’. Using Hintikka´s methods of model sets, an interpretation is built, such that a modally indifferent radical, as it is defined in this work, is changed into a norm. This is done in the following way. There is a sentence p which is well-constructed formula and a set (n, ñ) which contains two elements n and ñ, called normative values; n stands for “it is a norm” and ñ stands for “it is not a norm”. Next p is given a value based on a function V from p to the set n, ñ assigning one of these two elements to p. The value V (p) of p under V is called “deontic value of p under V”. If V (p) = n it is said that p is a norm under V and p is not a norm under V if V (p) = ñ. Based on this interpretation Kelsen´s position, which compares the truth of a statement with the validity of a norm, is criticized, the conclusion being that this parallelism cannot exist. Such a parallelism can exist only between the act of stating and the act of creating a norm. In addition several theses related to the issue are analysed with the result that the descriptions of how a legal order works empirically are shown to be correct. [Ulises Schmill Ordoñez] Resumen

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 10 No 30 (1978); 55-79

773.1.#.o: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

046.#.#.j: 2021-09-28 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 55-79

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1978.286

handle: 6c613b8275f6bc31

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2010-10-12 23:49:57.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-31 18:27:23.0

file_creator: Claudia Chavez

file_name: dc51f06a7da13d2685df75ccf9d671ed38adc7266fdedda136885e70a3489096.pdf

file_pages_number: 25

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 561983

245.1.0.b: Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen

last_modified: 2021-11-09 23:50:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen

Schmill Ordóñez, Ulises

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Schmill Ordóñez, Ulises (1978). Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 10 No 30, 1978; 55-79. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115637

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Schmill Ordóñez, Ulises
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Consideraciones sobre "derecho y lógica" de Hans Kelsen
Fecha
2018-11-08
Resumen
The purpose of this paper is the analysis of the essay “Law and Logic” by Hans Kelsen, especially his attitude about the logical principles of non-contradiction and what he calls the “inference rule” as not applicable to the law, even in the case of the conflict of norms. With this in mind the thesis that the norm is the sense of an act of will and is, therefore, neither true nor false, is analysed. Kelsen also maintains that only statements which have the sense of an act of thought are either true or false. It is held that these theses make no sense because no rational meaning can be given to the expressions ‘act of thought’ and ‘act of will’. Using Hintikka´s methods of model sets, an interpretation is built, such that a modally indifferent radical, as it is defined in this work, is changed into a norm. This is done in the following way. There is a sentence p which is well-constructed formula and a set (n, ñ) which contains two elements n and ñ, called normative values; n stands for “it is a norm” and ñ stands for “it is not a norm”. Next p is given a value based on a function V from p to the set n, ñ assigning one of these two elements to p. The value V (p) of p under V is called “deontic value of p under V”. If V (p) = n it is said that p is a norm under V and p is not a norm under V if V (p) = ñ. Based on this interpretation Kelsen´s position, which compares the truth of a statement with the validity of a norm, is criticized, the conclusion being that this parallelism cannot exist. Such a parallelism can exist only between the act of stating and the act of creating a norm. In addition several theses related to the issue are analysed with the result that the descriptions of how a legal order works empirically are shown to be correct. [Ulises Schmill Ordoñez] Resumen
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces