dor_id: 59202
506.#.#.a: Público
590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares
510.0.#.a: Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Medigraphic
561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/
561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
336.#.#.b: article
336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional
336.#.#.a: Artículo
351.#.#.6: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo
351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia
351.#.#.a: Artículos
harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM
270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx
590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)
270.#.#.d: MX
270.1.#.d: México
590.#.#.b: Concentrador
883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/
883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM
590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural
883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/
883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial
850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
856.4.0.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo/article/view/54152/48194
100.1.#.a: Ramírez Orendain, David
524.#.#.a: Ramírez Orendain, David (2014). Comparison between the adhesion forces of two orthodontic systems with moisture affi nity in two enamel surface conditions. Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia; Vol. 2 Núm. 2, 2014. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/59202
245.1.0.a: Comparison between the adhesion forces of two orthodontic systems with moisture affi nity in two enamel surface conditions
502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
264.#.0.c: 2014
264.#.1.c: 2016-01-29
506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistamexicanadeortodoncia@gmail.com
884.#.#.k: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo/article/view/54152
001.#.#.#: 120.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/54152
041.#.7.h: spa
520.3.#.a: The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with two systems of hydrophilic adhesives: (I) a cyanoacrylate adhesive (Smartbond, International Gestenco) and (II) a composite system (Transbond XT and Transbond™ IPM) in two enamel conditions: dry and artifi cial saliva contaminated. Materials and methods: 100 extracted premolars were stored in distilled water at 4 degrees Celsius. The teeth were cleaned, polished, and convenience distributed into 5 groups: (1) composite resin in enamel under dry conditions, (2) cyanoacrylate adhesive in dry enamel condition, (3) composite resin in enamel condition contaminated with artifi cial saliva before the primer, (4) composite resin enamel condition contaminated with artifi cial saliva after the primer, and (5) cyanoacrylate adhesive in artifi cial saliva contaminated enamel condition. The results showed that the adhesive system Transbond XT™ and Transbond MIP obtained the highest values of resistance to debonding in the dry enamel surface. Conclusions: The adhesive system Transbond XT™ and Transbond MIP I provide an adequate in vitro resistance to debonding in every enamel condition. The system based on cyanoacrylate adhesive Smartbond obtained proper values of resistance to debonding in dry enamel, however it obtained the lowest values in contaminated with enamel artificial saliva conditions, unsuitable for orthodontics, and even some samples were not cemented successfully in vitro under these conditions.Key words: Hydrophilic adhesive, orthodontic bracket, shear bond strength, cyanoacrylate adhesive, Smartbond
773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia; Vol. 2 Núm. 2 (2014)
773.1.#.o: https://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmo
022.#.#.a: ISSN: 2395-9215
310.#.#.a: Trimestral
264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2395-9215(16)30133-7
handle: 3195d981fc273404
harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0
856.#.0.q: application/pdf
last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00
license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es
license_type: by-nc-nd
_deleted_conflicts: 2-e7781696a6a554c2abd59e9fc08fc412
No entro en nada
No entro en nada 2