dor_id: 4132724

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Geofísica Internacional", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Dialnet, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Geobase

561.#.#.u: https://www.geofisica.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

351.#.#.b: Geofísica Internacional

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/1248/1227

100.1.#.a: Batista, I. S.; Paula, E. R. De; Abdu, M. A.; Kantor, I. J.

524.#.#.a: Batista, I. S., et al. (1991). Comparative study ofionogram F. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 1991; 249-252. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4132724

245.1.0.a: Comparative study ofionogram F

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1991

264.#.1.c: 1991-10-01

653.#.#.a: Altura pico de la capa F; Altura real; F layer peak height; True height

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistagi@igeofisica.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/1248

001.#.#.#: 063.oai:revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx:article/1248

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: We have carried out an intercomparison of the layer height parameters hmF2, hpF2 and hpF2[M(3000)} all deduced from h"(f) curve, in order to identify the conditions and trends, if any, under which the hmF2, according to the POLAN true height analysis, could be best represented by either of the other two parameters that are obtained empirically from simpleconsiderations. The analysis is carried out for a low-latitude and an equatorial station, for two different months, representative of local summer and equinox. The analysis shows that during nighttime hpF2 and hmF2[M(3000)] arc almost coincident and both of them give a very good estimation of hmF2 (according to the POLAN code), implying that either of them could be used to represent the F2 layer peak height within the same precision. During daytime, however, hpF2 is generally higher tha."l hmF2[M(3000)], the difference being more pronounced during December (local summer) months. It is observed that during daytime lunF2[M(3000)] overestimates hmF2 (derived using POLAN) over the equatorial station and underestimates it over the low-latitude station, while hpF2 generally overestimates it at both locations.

773.1.#.t: Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 1991; 249-252

773.1.#.o: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

022.#.#.a: ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 249-252

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.1991.30.4.1248

handle: 00ba0dd5d3613792

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2022-07-05 11:00:25.0

file_modification_date: 2022-07-24 03:47:45.0

file_creator: I. S. Batista

file_name: 0d5c80d4e5de5a117712fca8090271839212d6f577a10cf99f749c3eb9048977.pdf

file_pages_number: 4

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 528407

245.1.0.b: Comparative study ofionogram F2 peak height from different techniques

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-sa

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Comparative study ofionogram F

Batista, I. S.; Paula, E. R. De; Abdu, M. A.; Kantor, I. J.

Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM, publicado en Geofísica Internacional, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Batista, I. S., et al. (1991). Comparative study ofionogram F. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 30 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 1991; 249-252. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4132724

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Batista, I. S.; Paula, E. R. De; Abdu, M. A.; Kantor, I. J.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra
Título
Comparative study ofionogram F
Fecha
1991-10-01
Resumen
We have carried out an intercomparison of the layer height parameters hmF2, hpF2 and hpF2[M(3000)} all deduced from h"(f) curve, in order to identify the conditions and trends, if any, under which the hmF2, according to the POLAN true height analysis, could be best represented by either of the other two parameters that are obtained empirically from simpleconsiderations. The analysis is carried out for a low-latitude and an equatorial station, for two different months, representative of local summer and equinox. The analysis shows that during nighttime hpF2 and hmF2[M(3000)] arc almost coincident and both of them give a very good estimation of hmF2 (according to the POLAN code), implying that either of them could be used to represent the F2 layer peak height within the same precision. During daytime, however, hpF2 is generally higher tha."l hmF2[M(3000)], the difference being more pronounced during December (local summer) months. It is observed that during daytime lunF2[M(3000)] overestimates hmF2 (derived using POLAN) over the equatorial station and underestimates it over the low-latitude station, while hpF2 generally overestimates it at both locations.
Tema
Altura pico de la capa F; Altura real; F layer peak height; True height
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

Enlaces