La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico critica.ojs@filosoficas.unam.mx.
Ver términos de la licenciaGaviria, Christian, et al. (2014). Close Encounters with Arguments of the Third Kind:. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 46 Núm. 137, 2014; 85-112. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115262
Autor(es)
Gaviria, Christian; Jiménez-leal, William
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Close Encounters with Arguments of the Third Kind:
Fecha
2018-12-07
Resumen
This paper presents a comparative analysis of argumentation models based on the concepts of subjective probability and plausible reasoning. This analysis makes explicit the “family resemblance” between subjective probability and plausible reasoning, while examining the differences in the requirements that each model invokes regarding the evaluation of three types of informal fallacies: argument from authority (ad verecundiam), appeal to popularity (ad populum) and begging the question (petitio principii). We conclude that plausible reasoning, as it is characterized by Rescher and Walton, does not provide a strong alternative to probability as a either a normative or descriptive model of argument evaluation.
Tema
informal logic; fallacies; Bayes; argumentation; cognitive science; lógica informal; falacias; Bayes; argumentación; ciencia cognitiva
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503
