dor_id: 4161402

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Península", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.cephcis.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Ciencias Sociales y Económicas

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula

351.#.#.b: Península

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.90

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula/article/view/90492/79200

100.1.#.a: Torres Mazuera, Gabriela

524.#.#.a: Torres Mazuera, Gabriela (2025). Certified Insecurity of Indigenous Lands in Mexico: An Approach from the Racial Property Regime Focus. Península; Vol. 20 Núm. 1, 2025: Vol. XX, número 1; 189-217. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4161402

245.1.0.a: Certified Insecurity of Indigenous Lands in Mexico: An Approach from the Racial Property Regime Focus

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Centro Peninsular en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2025

264.#.1.c: 2024-12-13

653.#.#.a: indigeneity; land tenure; agrarian distribution; property regime; national alterity regime; pueblos indígenas; reparto agrario; régimen de propiedad; privatización de la propiedad

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistapeninsula@cephcis.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula/article/view/90492

001.#.#.#: 090.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/90492

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The 1990s marked the neoliberal shift that impacted agrarian policies in Mexico and Latin America. It involves the replacement of the peasant demand and land redistribution toward bureaucratic and entrepreneurial requirements for legal security of the same tenure. Subsequently, various countries undertook agricultural certification and titling programs, financed by international institutions, which heralded a new model of economic development. At the same time, and in a contradictory manner, multiple Latin American constitutions recognized, under the multicultural aegis, the collective rights for indigenous peoples, as well as new legal figures, designated as indigenous, for territorial protection. To what extent has neoliberal agrarian certification guaranteed legal certainty for peasant and indigenous people and communities in Mexico? And how effective was the legal recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights under the multicultural turn in defending collective territory? In this text, we aim to answer these questions by resuming the intersecting discourses of property and alterity regimes through which the hegemonic and counter-hegemonic uses and effects of indigenous identity, ejido, and community categories are contrasted.

773.1.#.t: Península; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2025): Vol. XX, número 1; 189-217

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/peninsula

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 2594-2743; ISSN: 1870-5766

310.#.#.a: Semestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 189-217

599.#.#.a: 90

264.#.1.b: Centro Peninsular en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, UNAM

harvesting_date: 2025-01-07 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2024-12-10 19:23:38.0

file_modification_date: 2024-12-10 13:23:39.0

file_name: 76f204bb9e187fcc5f14d4b08208e145b4e6b91de84e352557e4264913a0c01a.pdf

file_pages_number: 29

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.5

file_size: 218326

245.1.0.b: Inseguridad certificada de tierras indígenas en México: una aproximación desde los regímenes racializados de propiedad

last_modified: 2025-01-07 00:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Certified Insecurity of Indigenous Lands in Mexico: An Approach from the Racial Property Regime Focus

Torres Mazuera, Gabriela

Centro Peninsular en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, UNAM, publicado en Península, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Centro Peninsular en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Torres Mazuera, Gabriela (2025). Certified Insecurity of Indigenous Lands in Mexico: An Approach from the Racial Property Regime Focus. Península; Vol. 20 Núm. 1, 2025: Vol. XX, número 1; 189-217. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4161402

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Torres Mazuera, Gabriela
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Ciencias Sociales y Económicas
Título
Certified Insecurity of Indigenous Lands in Mexico: An Approach from the Racial Property Regime Focus
Fecha
2024-12-13
Resumen
The 1990s marked the neoliberal shift that impacted agrarian policies in Mexico and Latin America. It involves the replacement of the peasant demand and land redistribution toward bureaucratic and entrepreneurial requirements for legal security of the same tenure. Subsequently, various countries undertook agricultural certification and titling programs, financed by international institutions, which heralded a new model of economic development. At the same time, and in a contradictory manner, multiple Latin American constitutions recognized, under the multicultural aegis, the collective rights for indigenous peoples, as well as new legal figures, designated as indigenous, for territorial protection. To what extent has neoliberal agrarian certification guaranteed legal certainty for peasant and indigenous people and communities in Mexico? And how effective was the legal recognition of indigenous peoples’ rights under the multicultural turn in defending collective territory? In this text, we aim to answer these questions by resuming the intersecting discourses of property and alterity regimes through which the hegemonic and counter-hegemonic uses and effects of indigenous identity, ejido, and community categories are contrasted.
Tema
indigeneity; land tenure; agrarian distribution; property regime; national alterity regime; pueblos indígenas; reparto agrario; régimen de propiedad; privatización de la propiedad
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 2594-2743; ISSN: 1870-5766

Enlaces