dor_id: 4115535

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.34

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/435/423

100.1.#.a: Omar Seleme, Hugo

524.#.#.a: Omar Seleme, Hugo (2004). Can Utilitarianism Be Deontological? A Response to Kymlicka. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 107, 2004; 39 - 66. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115535

245.1.0.a: Can Utilitarianism Be Deontological? A Response to Kymlicka

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2004

264.#.1.c: 2018-11-29

653.#.#.a: Rawls; priority; right; goodness; Rawls; prioridad; correcto; bondad

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico critica.ojs@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/435

001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/435

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: In his ;A Theory of Justice, Rawls claims that the defects that some conceptions of justice, such as utilitarianism or perfectionism, have at a normative level are due to the fact that, because of their teleological character, they do not give priority to what is right as opposed to what is good. Kymlicka has questioned this statement. His strategy has been to provide an interpretation of utilitarianism which respects the priority of what is right. This would prove that the defects at a normative level ascribed to utilitarianism by Rawls do not respond to its teleological character. The classification of doctrines into deontological or teleological would lack the relevance that Rawls ascribes to them. This article aims at proving that Kymlicka"s argument to point out the triviality of the classification is not successful because he fails to provide a deontological interpretation of utilitarianism.

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 107 (2004); 39 - 66

773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 39 - 66

599.#.#.a: 34

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.2004.435

harvesting_date: 2024-02-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2005-05-13 00:44:08.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-24 18:13:13.0

file_name: 1f4ecdbc0272476fa12dc0cf056cf70b80f6e9afc4dfdbeac2339015414829ef.pdf

file_pages_number: 28

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 168940

last_modified: 2025-02-11 13:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Can Utilitarianism Be Deontological? A Response to Kymlicka

Omar Seleme, Hugo

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Omar Seleme, Hugo (2004). Can Utilitarianism Be Deontological? A Response to Kymlicka. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 36 Núm. 107, 2004; 39 - 66. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115535

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Omar Seleme, Hugo
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Can Utilitarianism Be Deontological? A Response to Kymlicka
Fecha
2018-11-29
Resumen
In his ;A Theory of Justice, Rawls claims that the defects that some conceptions of justice, such as utilitarianism or perfectionism, have at a normative level are due to the fact that, because of their teleological character, they do not give priority to what is right as opposed to what is good. Kymlicka has questioned this statement. His strategy has been to provide an interpretation of utilitarianism which respects the priority of what is right. This would prove that the defects at a normative level ascribed to utilitarianism by Rawls do not respond to its teleological character. The classification of doctrines into deontological or teleological would lack the relevance that Rawls ascribes to them. This article aims at proving that Kymlicka"s argument to point out the triviality of the classification is not successful because he fails to provide a deontological interpretation of utilitarianism.
Tema
Rawls; priority; right; goodness; Rawls; prioridad; correcto; bondad
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces