dor_id: 4115537

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única. Los revisores son externos nacionales e internacionales.

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus), Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE), Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR), The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: http://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/995/961

100.1.#.a: Gómez, Ricardo J.

524.#.#.a: Gómez, Ricardo J. (1995). Beyond Realism-Instrumentalism Dichotomy. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 27 No 80, 1995; 97-118. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115537

245.1.0.a: Beyond Realism-Instrumentalism Dichotomy

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1995

264.#.1.c: 2019-01-08

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2019-01-08, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/995

001.#.#.#: critica:oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/995

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: My main purpose is to show that (1) the standard characterization of instrumentalism (Duhem) fails to grasp adequately the complexity of the cognitive status of important scientific theories in the past, e.g. Ptolemy"s astronomy; (2) that failure is closely related to certain presuppositions which have been recently criticized from different points of view avoiding the dichotomy instrumentalism-realism, and (3) such opposition between instrumentalism and realism has been usually understood in a too extreme, atemporal and global way. I recommend to substitute it by a myriad of more or less strong realisms taking into account not only the different levels and components in a scientific theory, but also the historical circumstances under which its cognitive status is evaluated. My main purpose is to show that (1) the standard characterization of instrumentalism (Duhem) fails to grasp adequately the complexity of the cognitive status of important scientific theories in the past, e.g. Ptolemy"s astronomy; (2) that failure is closely related to certain presuppositions which have been recently criticized from different points of view avoiding the dichotomy instrumentalism-realism, and (3) such opposition between instrumentalism and realism has been usually understood in a too extreme, atemporal and global way. I recommend to substitute it by a myriad of more or less strong realisms taking into account not only the different levels and components in a scientific theory, but also the historical circumstances under which its cognitive status is evaluated.

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 27 No 80 (1995); 97-118

773.1.#.o: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

046.#.#.j: 2021-09-28 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 97-118

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1995.995

handle: 13adf1defbdf7cb0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2010-10-04 19:50:40.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-20 15:30:56.0

file_name: 7f50ffd590c5a7d7d50368c190ae8bf09f15a0a9151d5b6719bdac6ff2718001.pdf

file_pages_number: 22

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 66204

245.1.0.b: Más allá de la dicotomía realismo-instrumentalismo

last_modified: 2021-11-09 23:50:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Beyond Realism-Instrumentalism Dichotomy

Gómez, Ricardo J.

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Gómez, Ricardo J. (1995). Beyond Realism-Instrumentalism Dichotomy. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol 27 No 80, 1995; 97-118. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115537

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Gómez, Ricardo J.
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Beyond Realism-Instrumentalism Dichotomy
Fecha
2019-01-08
Resumen
My main purpose is to show that (1) the standard characterization of instrumentalism (Duhem) fails to grasp adequately the complexity of the cognitive status of important scientific theories in the past, e.g. Ptolemy"s astronomy; (2) that failure is closely related to certain presuppositions which have been recently criticized from different points of view avoiding the dichotomy instrumentalism-realism, and (3) such opposition between instrumentalism and realism has been usually understood in a too extreme, atemporal and global way. I recommend to substitute it by a myriad of more or less strong realisms taking into account not only the different levels and components in a scientific theory, but also the historical circumstances under which its cognitive status is evaluated. My main purpose is to show that (1) the standard characterization of instrumentalism (Duhem) fails to grasp adequately the complexity of the cognitive status of important scientific theories in the past, e.g. Ptolemy"s astronomy; (2) that failure is closely related to certain presuppositions which have been recently criticized from different points of view avoiding the dichotomy instrumentalism-realism, and (3) such opposition between instrumentalism and realism has been usually understood in a too extreme, atemporal and global way. I recommend to substitute it by a myriad of more or less strong realisms taking into account not only the different levels and components in a scientific theory, but also the historical circumstances under which its cognitive status is evaluated.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces