dor_id: 4115520

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Cada artículo es evaluado mediante una revisión ciega única

510.0.#.a: Arts and Humanities Citation Index, Revistes Cientifiques de Ciencies Socials Humanitais (CARHUS Plus); Latinoamericanas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades (CLASE); Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH PLUS); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); SCOPUS, Journal Storage (JSTOR); The Philosopher’s Index, Ulrich’s Periodical Directory

561.#.#.u: https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Artes y Humanidades

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

351.#.#.b: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/908/876

100.1.#.a: Martínez Velasco, Jesús

524.#.#.a: Martínez Velasco, Jesús (1993). Presupuestos básicos de la ciencia y cambio científico. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 75, 1993; 55-83. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115520

245.1.0.a: Presupuestos básicos de la ciencia y cambio científico

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 1993

264.#.1.c: 2019-01-07

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico alberto@filosoficas.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica/article/view/908

001.#.#.#: 034.oai:ojs2.132.248.184.97:article/908

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: This paper discusses the issue of whether prevailing research traditions in science —assumed as sine qua non conditions of the very scientific knowledge— are capable of change or not. If they are, can such a change be called rational and progressive? Does it follow some methodology? And finally, how is it to be explained? The issue is seen in the light of four different contemporary theories: Kuhn’s, Lakatos’, Popper’s, and, especially, Laudan’s. This latter epistemological model is approached in more detail, for Laudan is a post-Kuhnian and post-Popperian who contributes —the author considers— a surpassing vision of the concepts of progressive change and rationality in science. As Martínez Velasco asserts, in Laudan’s view science is not an activity mainly directed to the search for truth, but devoted instead to the resolution of problems; theories and research traditions should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in this enterprise. Scientific progress is thus precisely the increase of the theoretical capability of producing desired results. Nevertheless, the author claims that the idea of progress in science development is still a “cloudy” concept, although it is indeed objective. [Laura Lecuona]

773.1.#.t: Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 75 (1993); 55-83

773.1.#.o: https://critica.filosoficas.unam.mx/index.php/critica

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 55-83

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1993.908

handle: 00fabd02e0461a78

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2010-10-05 00:19:30.0

file_modification_date: 2010-10-27 21:51:18.0

file_name: b5d94da7b3595c86dbe860bfa60ec0bb252c5657ee2b7d3b54b22dd37ec908af.pdf

file_pages_number: 29

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 81648

245.1.0.b: Basic Presuppositions of Science and Scientific Change

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Presupuestos básicos de la ciencia y cambio científico

Martínez Velasco, Jesús

Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM, publicado en Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Martínez Velasco, Jesús (1993). Presupuestos básicos de la ciencia y cambio científico. Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía; Vol. 25 Núm. 75, 1993; 55-83. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4115520

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Martínez Velasco, Jesús
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Artes y Humanidades
Título
Presupuestos básicos de la ciencia y cambio científico
Fecha
2019-01-07
Resumen
This paper discusses the issue of whether prevailing research traditions in science —assumed as sine qua non conditions of the very scientific knowledge— are capable of change or not. If they are, can such a change be called rational and progressive? Does it follow some methodology? And finally, how is it to be explained? The issue is seen in the light of four different contemporary theories: Kuhn’s, Lakatos’, Popper’s, and, especially, Laudan’s. This latter epistemological model is approached in more detail, for Laudan is a post-Kuhnian and post-Popperian who contributes —the author considers— a surpassing vision of the concepts of progressive change and rationality in science. As Martínez Velasco asserts, in Laudan’s view science is not an activity mainly directed to the search for truth, but devoted instead to the resolution of problems; theories and research traditions should be evaluated in terms of their effectiveness in this enterprise. Scientific progress is thus precisely the increase of the theoretical capability of producing desired results. Nevertheless, the author claims that the idea of progress in science development is still a “cloudy” concept, although it is indeed objective. [Laura Lecuona]
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-4905; ISSN impreso: 0011-1503

Enlaces