dor_id: 4111648

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/75561/67474

100.1.#.a: Colombo dos Santos, Bruna; de Carvalho Neto, Marcus Bentes

524.#.#.a: Colombo dos Santos, Bruna, et al. (2019). B. F. Skinner’s Evolving Views of Punishment: I. 1930-1940. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 2019. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111648

245.1.0.a: B. F. Skinner’s Evolving Views of Punishment: I. 1930-1940

502.#.#.c: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

561.1.#.a: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

264.#.0.c: 2019

264.#.1.c: 2019-12-01

653.#.#.a: Punishment; behavior analysis; b. f. skinner; history

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2019-12-01, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/75561

001.#.#.#: oai:ojs.phoenicis.tic.unam.mx:article/75561

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Punishment is a controversial topic. in the theoretical field, there are two definitions of punishment that correspond to two theories: one that considers punishment as asymmetric to reinforcement and the other that considers it symmetric. one of authors that defended an asymmetric view was b. f. skinner. citations of skinner’s position on punishment most often rely on what he described in science and human behavior. the objective of this review was to present the historical development of the concept of punishment in work of b. f. skinner, in the early years of his career, from the 1930s. we consider the definition, explanatory mechanisms, concepts related to punishment and the notion of symmetry and asymmetry. the term used in the 1930s to refer to punishment was negative reinforcement/conditioning. skinner talked about punishment for the first time in 1935, considering it a process that decreased operant strength. in 1938, he began questioning this punishment effect, culminating in a change in definition in the latter year.  the possible reasons for this change were the development of the concept of reserve and konorski and miller’s (1937) criticisms.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 (2019)

773.1.#.o: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

046.#.#.j: 2021-05-27 00:00:00.000000

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

758.#.#.1: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v45.i2.75561

handle: 00bb6487aaef49f5

harvesting_date: 2021-04-09 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2020-04-30 20:37:09.0

file_modification_date: 2020-04-30 20:37:12.0

file_name: 33fe442ea08c181a3b0c15967f71379fae5fe9d74c08c107c9434c66733ffc7c.pdf

file_pages_number: 24

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 285737

last_modified: 2021-06-30 20:30:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

B. F. Skinner’s Evolving Views of Punishment: I. 1930-1940

Colombo dos Santos, Bruna; de Carvalho Neto, Marcus Bentes

Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Colombo dos Santos, Bruna, et al. (2019). B. F. Skinner’s Evolving Views of Punishment: I. 1930-1940. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol 45, No 2 2019. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111648

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Colombo dos Santos, Bruna; de Carvalho Neto, Marcus Bentes
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
B. F. Skinner’s Evolving Views of Punishment: I. 1930-1940
Fecha
2019-12-01
Resumen
Punishment is a controversial topic. in the theoretical field, there are two definitions of punishment that correspond to two theories: one that considers punishment as asymmetric to reinforcement and the other that considers it symmetric. one of authors that defended an asymmetric view was b. f. skinner. citations of skinner’s position on punishment most often rely on what he described in science and human behavior. the objective of this review was to present the historical development of the concept of punishment in work of b. f. skinner, in the early years of his career, from the 1930s. we consider the definition, explanatory mechanisms, concepts related to punishment and the notion of symmetry and asymmetry. the term used in the 1930s to refer to punishment was negative reinforcement/conditioning. skinner talked about punishment for the first time in 1935, considering it a process that decreased operant strength. in 1938, he began questioning this punishment effect, culminating in a change in definition in the latter year.  the possible reasons for this change were the development of the concept of reserve and konorski and miller’s (1937) criticisms.
Tema
Punishment; behavior analysis; b. f. skinner; history
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces