dor_id: 43168

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: si

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/45500/40926

100.1.#.a: Lombard Romero, Luis; Canseco Jiménez, Joaquín Federico; Cuairán Ruidíaz, Vicente; Gutiérrez Camacho, Claudia; Maldonado Moreno, Juan Antonio

524.#.#.a: Lombard Romero, Luis, et al. (2015). Assessment of two techniques for the recording of mandibular central relationship: gothic arch versus power centric relation. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 1-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43168

245.1.0.a: Assessment of two techniques for the recording of mandibular central relationship: gothic arch versus power centric relation

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2015-01-12

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2015-01-12, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/45500

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: The search for the true mandibular position with respect to theglenoid fossa and the relationship of the other components whichconstitute the temporomandibular joint known as centric relation(CR) are essential factors for its diagnosis, treatment and stability.The aim of the present study was to assess two techniques used forrecording CR: power centric technique and gothic arch technique,with the purpose of determining the most effective method toconfer greater accuracy to the recording. This was triggered bythe fact that in our institution some inconsistencies had beendetected when taking records of patients affl icted with considerables keletal discrepancies or malformations. Fifteen healthy skeletal class II patients were assessed. Patients’ ages ranged from 13to 17 years. Eight patients were female (53.4%) and seven male(46.6%). Using both techniques, thirty mountings were performedin a semi-adjustable articulator, condylar changes were monitoredusing axial condylar position indicator (API). Results revealed no significant differences, nevertheless, observed transversal, verticaland saggital changes were greater with the gothic arch technique.

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 1-ING

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

758.#.#.1: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/index

handle: 19dd68b647cda697

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-aba9a09ca8bedb3801ab9a5ba72e9977

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Assessment of two techniques for the recording of mandibular central relationship: gothic arch versus power centric relation

Lombard Romero, Luis; Canseco Jiménez, Joaquín Federico; Cuairán Ruidíaz, Vicente; Gutiérrez Camacho, Claudia; Maldonado Moreno, Juan Antonio

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Lombard Romero, Luis, et al. (2015). Assessment of two techniques for the recording of mandibular central relationship: gothic arch versus power centric relation. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 1-ING. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43168

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Lombard Romero, Luis; Canseco Jiménez, Joaquín Federico; Cuairán Ruidíaz, Vicente; Gutiérrez Camacho, Claudia; Maldonado Moreno, Juan Antonio
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Assessment of two techniques for the recording of mandibular central relationship: gothic arch versus power centric relation
Fecha
2015-01-12
Resumen
The search for the true mandibular position with respect to theglenoid fossa and the relationship of the other components whichconstitute the temporomandibular joint known as centric relation(CR) are essential factors for its diagnosis, treatment and stability.The aim of the present study was to assess two techniques used forrecording CR: power centric technique and gothic arch technique,with the purpose of determining the most effective method toconfer greater accuracy to the recording. This was triggered bythe fact that in our institution some inconsistencies had beendetected when taking records of patients affl icted with considerables keletal discrepancies or malformations. Fifteen healthy skeletal class II patients were assessed. Patients’ ages ranged from 13to 17 years. Eight patients were female (53.4%) and seven male(46.6%). Using both techniques, thirty mountings were performedin a semi-adjustable articulator, condylar changes were monitoredusing axial condylar position indicator (API). Results revealed no significant differences, nevertheless, observed transversal, verticaland saggital changes were greater with the gothic arch technique.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces