dor_id: 43206

506.#.#.a: Público

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO)

561.#.#.u: http://www.odonto.unam.mx/

561.#.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo Técnico-Profesional

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom

351.#.#.b: Revista Odontológica Mexicana

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: http://www.revistas.unam.mx/front/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural, UNAM

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/50809/45537

100.1.#.a: Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra; Yamamoto Nagano, Adolfo

524.#.#.a: Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra, et al. (2015). Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 3; 2015. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43206

720.#.#.a: Yamamoto Nagano, Adolfo ; Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra

245.1.0.a: Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2015

264.#.1.c: 2015-06-29

653.#.#.a: Glass ionomer; microleakage; conditioner; polyacrylic acid

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, fecha de asignación de la licencia 2015-06-29, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio de danyelacarmona@gmail.com

884.#.#.k: http://revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rom/article/view/50809

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The aim of the present study was to assess microleakage experienced by improved glass ionomer (Ketac Molar Easymix®)with and without use of conditioner. In order to conduct this study, 40 third molars were used. Molars had previously been extracted,cleansed and hydrated. Two 20 randomly selected sample groupswere established. Samples were subjected to prophylaxis andclass V cavities were created on the vestibular (labial) surfaceof the teeth. Before ionomer application, and according tomanu facturer’s instructions, group A received a polyacrylic acidconditioner. Whereas group B received direct ionomer application. All samples were subjected to a thermo-cycling process and thenwere immersed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 30 minutes. Allmolars were sectioned with carbide burr executing longitudinal cutsat the preparation´s center. Each section was carefully examinedunder the microscope. Samples were rated and the following wasobserved: microleakage, for group A was 2.06% and for group B1.84% which did not represent statistically signifi cant differences. It can therefore be concluded that application of conditioner in thistype of cavities and with this particular material does not causestatistically signifi cant differences

773.1.#.t: Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 3, (2015)

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 1870-199X

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Odontología, UNAM

handle: 54aec304b3feebb0

harvesting_date: 2019-02-06 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

last_modified: 2022-11-11 19:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-6b45c7dde8122818b18c8acc6f7ee9b9

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner

Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra; Yamamoto Nagano, Adolfo

Facultad de Odontología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Odontológica Mexicana, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Odontología, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra, et al. (2015). Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner. Revista Odontológica Mexicana; Vol 19, No 3; 2015. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/43206

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra; Yamamoto Nagano, Adolfo
Colaborador(es)
Yamamoto Nagano, Adolfo ; Jiménez Arribas, Alejandra
Tipo
Artículo Técnico-Profesional
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
Assessment of improved glass ionomer microleakage (Ketac Molar Easymix®) with or without use of a conditioner
Fecha
2015-06-29
Resumen
The aim of the present study was to assess microleakage experienced by improved glass ionomer (Ketac Molar Easymix®)with and without use of conditioner. In order to conduct this study, 40 third molars were used. Molars had previously been extracted,cleansed and hydrated. Two 20 randomly selected sample groupswere established. Samples were subjected to prophylaxis andclass V cavities were created on the vestibular (labial) surfaceof the teeth. Before ionomer application, and according tomanu facturer’s instructions, group A received a polyacrylic acidconditioner. Whereas group B received direct ionomer application. All samples were subjected to a thermo-cycling process and thenwere immersed in a 1% methylene blue solution for 30 minutes. Allmolars were sectioned with carbide burr executing longitudinal cutsat the preparation´s center. Each section was carefully examinedunder the microscope. Samples were rated and the following wasobserved: microleakage, for group A was 2.06% and for group B1.84% which did not represent statistically signifi cant differences. It can therefore be concluded that application of conditioner in thistype of cavities and with this particular material does not causestatistically signifi cant differences
Tema
Glass ionomer; microleakage; conditioner; polyacrylic acid
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN: 1870-199X

Enlaces