dor_id: 4136821

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Educación Química", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Bibliografía latinoamericana (Biblat); Coordinación de la formación del personal de nivel superior (CAPES); Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Dialnet; Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Matriz De Información de Análisis de Revistas (MIAR); PERIODICA; Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); A Division of the American Chemical Society (CAS); Scimago Journal & Country Rank; Scopus; European Reference index for the Humanities and Social Sciences (ERIHPLUS)

561.#.#.u: https://quimica.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Biología y Química

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/req

351.#.#.b: Educación Química

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/req/article/view/66197/58108

100.1.#.a: Kelter, Paul

524.#.#.a: Kelter, Paul (2004). Assessment in Academia. The good, the bad and the ugly. Educación Química; Vol. 15 Núm. 2, 2004; 113-119. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4136821

245.1.0.a: Assessment in Academia. The good, the bad and the ugly

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Química, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2004

264.#.1.c: 2018-08-25

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico educquim@unam.mx

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/req/article/view/66197

001.#.#.#: 047.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/66197

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: The use of assessment tools in academia is increasing at a torrid pace. The most important factor in this stunning increase in assessment is the desire for accountability during difficult economic times. In particular: administrators need to prove to a skeptical public that tax dollars are being spent wisely; individual department faculty need to justify their own budgets; employers want to know that the graduates they hire have the content, thinking and people skills that are required by corporations; and federal, state and private granting organizations want to know that their grant money is being put to good use. This paper will discuss the audiences for assessment and the types of tools that are now a normal part of our faculty responsibilities in the United States. The special focuses will be on considering how we distinguish good teaching from bad teaching, what U.S. universities are doing, and can do, to deal with bad teachers, and how I deal with these issues in my own classroom.

773.1.#.t: Educación Química; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2004); 113-119

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/req

022.#.#.a: ISSN electrónico: 1870-8404; ISSN impreso: 0187-893X

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 113-119

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Química, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2004.2.66197

handle: 00823f90c727202d

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2007-02-05 20:30:30.0

file_modification_date: 2007-08-29 02:02:56.0

file_creator: Facultad de Química de la UNAM

file_name: 16b5426e5cc4ae47f175bea32ac814568ac05f02e3dd1a8dc4a363c00627ad30.pdf

file_pages_number: 7

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 132383

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Assessment in Academia. The good, the bad and the ugly

Kelter, Paul

Facultad de Química, UNAM, publicado en Educación Química, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Facultad de Química, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Kelter, Paul (2004). Assessment in Academia. The good, the bad and the ugly. Educación Química; Vol. 15 Núm. 2, 2004; 113-119. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4136821

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Kelter, Paul
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Biología y Química
Título
Assessment in Academia. The good, the bad and the ugly
Fecha
2018-08-25
Resumen
The use of assessment tools in academia is increasing at a torrid pace. The most important factor in this stunning increase in assessment is the desire for accountability during difficult economic times. In particular: administrators need to prove to a skeptical public that tax dollars are being spent wisely; individual department faculty need to justify their own budgets; employers want to know that the graduates they hire have the content, thinking and people skills that are required by corporations; and federal, state and private granting organizations want to know that their grant money is being put to good use. This paper will discuss the audiences for assessment and the types of tools that are now a normal part of our faculty responsibilities in the United States. The special focuses will be on considering how we distinguish good teaching from bad teaching, what U.S. universities are doing, and can do, to deal with bad teachers, and how I deal with these issues in my own classroom.
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN electrónico: 1870-8404; ISSN impreso: 0187-893X

Enlaces