dor_id: 4132946

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la revista "Geofísica Internacional", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS, Dialnet, Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ); Geobase

561.#.#.u: https://www.geofisica.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

351.#.#.b: Geofísica Internacional

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/460/474

100.1.#.a: Joshi, Anand; Kumar, Ashvini; Lomnitz, Cinna; Castaños, Heriberta

524.#.#.a: Joshi, Anand, et al. (2012). Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 51 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 2012; 349-­363. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4132946

245.1.0.a: Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2012

264.#.1.c: 2012-10-01

653.#.#.a: normalidad; residual; predicción sismica; Himalaya; normality; residual; seismic; Himalaya

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico revistagi@igeofisica.unam.mx

884.#.#.k: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI/article/view/460

001.#.#.#: 063.oai:revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx:article/460

041.#.7.h: spa

520.3.#.a: This paper discusses the applicability of different ground motion prediction equations (GMPE) for regional studies. Cumulative probability plots and residual plots are used to check the normality and model inadequacies in various GMPE. It is seen that as long as the data set is similar to that used for generating GMPE the normality and model adequacies are broadly satisfied. However, clear deviation from normality is observed when using GMPE for predicting different data sets. In order to check utility of various worldwide GMPE for dataset other than that used for preparing GMPE, the dataset of Himalayan earthquakes record on strong motion network has been predicted using the GMPE given by Abrahamson and Litehiser (1989), Boore and Atkinson (2008), Boore et al. (1997) and Joyner and Boore (1981). It is seen that these GMPE shows presence of fat tails together with large model inadequacies when they are ides for predicting Himalayan data. The data for Himalayan earthquake are also predicted by using the GMPE developed using Himalayan data. It is seen that this GMPE obeys normality and does not reflect any model inadequacies. The seismic map for 10% probability of exceedence of peak ground acceleration of 0.1g is prepared using modified method given by Joshi and Patel (1997). It is seen that two different regional GMPE developed using Himalayan dataset gives similar seismic zonation map however large deviation in the seismic zonation map is observed when GMPE given by Abrahamson and Litehiser (1989) has been used.doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2012.51.4.1231

773.1.#.t: Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 51 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 2012; 349-­363

773.1.#.o: http://revistagi.geofisica.unam.mx/index.php/RGI

022.#.#.a: ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

310.#.#.a: Trimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 349-­363

264.#.1.b: Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2012.51.4.1231

handle: 4f010ca2b9622162

harvesting_date: 2023-06-20 16:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2022-07-06 18:33:49.0

file_modification_date: 2022-07-06 18:33:49.0

file_creator: Anand Joshi

file_name: 72592b56cac354224724a033a54aeee1597dfeb5d5b69c7a8a1548d1e4eadbf7.pdf

file_pages_number: 15

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.6

file_size: 848941

245.1.0.b: Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies

last_modified: 2023-06-20 16:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-sa

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies

Joshi, Anand; Kumar, Ashvini; Lomnitz, Cinna; Castaños, Heriberta

Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM, publicado en Geofísica Internacional, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Entidad o dependencia
Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM
Revista
Repositorio
Contacto
Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

Cita

Joshi, Anand, et al. (2012). Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies. Geofísica Internacional; Vol. 51 Núm. 4: Octubre 1, 2012; 349-­363. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4132946

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Joshi, Anand; Kumar, Ashvini; Lomnitz, Cinna; Castaños, Heriberta
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Físico Matemáticas y Ciencias de la Tierra
Título
Applicability of attenuation relations for regional studies
Fecha
2012-10-01
Resumen
This paper discusses the applicability of different ground motion prediction equations (GMPE) for regional studies. Cumulative probability plots and residual plots are used to check the normality and model inadequacies in various GMPE. It is seen that as long as the data set is similar to that used for generating GMPE the normality and model adequacies are broadly satisfied. However, clear deviation from normality is observed when using GMPE for predicting different data sets. In order to check utility of various worldwide GMPE for dataset other than that used for preparing GMPE, the dataset of Himalayan earthquakes record on strong motion network has been predicted using the GMPE given by Abrahamson and Litehiser (1989), Boore and Atkinson (2008), Boore et al. (1997) and Joyner and Boore (1981). It is seen that these GMPE shows presence of fat tails together with large model inadequacies when they are ides for predicting Himalayan data. The data for Himalayan earthquake are also predicted by using the GMPE developed using Himalayan data. It is seen that this GMPE obeys normality and does not reflect any model inadequacies. The seismic map for 10% probability of exceedence of peak ground acceleration of 0.1g is prepared using modified method given by Joshi and Patel (1997). It is seen that two different regional GMPE developed using Himalayan dataset gives similar seismic zonation map however large deviation in the seismic zonation map is observed when GMPE given by Abrahamson and Litehiser (1989) has been used.doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/igeof.00167169p.2012.51.4.1231
Tema
normalidad; residual; predicción sismica; Himalaya; normality; residual; seismic; Himalaya
Idioma
spa
ISSN
ISSN-L: 2954-436X; ISSN impreso: 0016-7169

Enlaces