dor_id: 39708

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM.109

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/23573/23907

100.1.#.a: Schusterz, Richard

524.#.#.a: Schusterz, Richard (2001). An animal model of cooperating dyads: Methodological and theoretical" issues. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 27 Núm. 2, 2001. Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/39708

245.1.0.a: An animal model of cooperating dyads: Methodological and theoretical" issues

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2001

264.#.1.c: 2011-01-26

653.#.#.a: Laws Of Learning; Contingencies; Physically Isolated; Cooperative Behavior; Defection; Social Groups; Reinforcement; Aggressive Dominance; Allocation; Individual Options; Leyes De Aprendizaje; Contingencias; Aislamiento; Conducta De Cooperación; Deserción; Grupo Social; Reforzamiento; Dominancia Agresiva; Distribución. Opción Individual

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/23573

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23573

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Probably the most widespread form of cooperation in animals occurs when individuals learn to coordinate behaviors for joint outcomes. Coordination also characterizes courtship and aggression in a variety of species. Yet the social significance of coordinated actions is often neglected in favor of an individual behavior perspective with respect to what is learned and by what processes. Learning theory has generally followed the suggestion of Skinner that the same "laws of learning," based on behavior-outcome contingencies, are sufficient whether individuals cooperate or behave alone. Support comes from laboratory models of cooperation with animal or human subjects that minimize social interaction. Participants are physically isolated in separate chambers and individually reinforced according to how both behave. Isolation models have also been used by game theorists and behavioral ecologists to analyze how subjects choose between individual behaviors representing the options of cooperating and defecting. Field studies of cooperative coordination in both animals and humans demonstrate that outcomes alone are insufficient to explain why and how cooperation occurs. Cooperative behaviors and allocation of outcomes are shown to arise from social influences both during the performance and from shared membership insocial groups. In some cases, cooperation persists when participants benefit unequally or even when individual action seems to be more profitable. Research is described using a laboratory model to study social influences on cooperation. Pairs of laboratory rats are rewarded for coordinating back-and-forth shuttling within a shared chamber in which social interaction is unrestricted and pairs have considerable latitude in how the reinforcement contingency is satisfied. In addition, competition over outcomes can be evoked by periodic presentation of one or two reinforcements. Results are described showing that coordinated shuttling is a social behavior sensitive to the presence and type of partner and the reinforcement contingency. Pairs differ in levels of coordination and in the emergence of stable asymmetries in dimensions that include roles, aggressive dominance, and allocation of outcomes. Evidence is also presented that cooperation affects participants, modifying the preference between cooperative and individual options and increasing post-session consumption of the reinforcement.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 27 Núm. 2 (2001)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 165-200

599.#.#.a: 109

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v27.i2.23573

harvesting_date: 2024-02-23 00:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

245.1.0.b: Un modelo animal de diadas cooperativas: Puntos conceptuales y metodológicos

last_modified: 2024-02-23 00:00:08

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

_deleted_conflicts: 2-98e01ff21b49a0962ffb10128d496275

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2