dor_id: 4111617

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/58841/52257

100.1.#.a: Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Laurenti, Carolina

524.#.#.a: Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio, et al. (2016). A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111617

245.1.0.a: A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2016

264.#.1.c: 2016-12-01

653.#.#.a: Behavior analysis; pragmatism; world view; contextualism; mechanism

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/58841

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/58841

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Relations established between behavior analysis and the philosophy of pragmatism generally focus on the matter of truth criteria, in which both philosophies seem to converge. Nevertheless, there is another aspect in which such philosophies could find common ground: their world views. On one hand, several authors have defended that the world view of behavior analysis is that of contextualism, which is precisely a pragmatic world view. On the other hand, some have argued that mechanism fits better as the world view of behavior analysis. A third point is raised by others: behavior analysis would be “a-ontological”, that is, free from metaphysical commitments. This essay examines arguments surrounding this debate, and evaluate how they relate to pragmatism. As a conclusion, we note that pragmatism not only does not interdict metaphysical claims, such as ontological ones, but also that it encompasses a particular world view. To recognize this aspect of pragmatic philosophy is important for a thorough understanding of its relations with behavior analysis.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 (2016)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v42.i3.58841

handle: 4ee054e6e4637b17

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2017-04-12 21:37:19.0

file_modification_date: 2017-04-12 21:37:20.0

file_name: af820b90ef4b387e8d446d07a9b68eab979c99ab439f130aace403e7a1a314f3.pdf

file_pages_number: 15

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 167130

245.1.0.b: A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis

Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Laurenti, Carolina

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio, et al. (2016). A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 3 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111617

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Laurenti, Carolina
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
A Reassessment of Pragmatism in Behavior Analysis: II. The World Views of Behavior Analysis
Fecha
2016-12-01
Resumen
Relations established between behavior analysis and the philosophy of pragmatism generally focus on the matter of truth criteria, in which both philosophies seem to converge. Nevertheless, there is another aspect in which such philosophies could find common ground: their world views. On one hand, several authors have defended that the world view of behavior analysis is that of contextualism, which is precisely a pragmatic world view. On the other hand, some have argued that mechanism fits better as the world view of behavior analysis. A third point is raised by others: behavior analysis would be “a-ontological”, that is, free from metaphysical commitments. This essay examines arguments surrounding this debate, and evaluate how they relate to pragmatism. As a conclusion, we note that pragmatism not only does not interdict metaphysical claims, such as ontological ones, but also that it encompasses a particular world view. To recognize this aspect of pragmatic philosophy is important for a thorough understanding of its relations with behavior analysis.
Tema
Behavior analysis; pragmatism; world view; contextualism; mechanism
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces