dor_id: 4111616

506.#.#.a: Público

590.#.#.d: Los artículos enviados a la "Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta", se juzgan por medio de un proceso de revisión por pares

510.0.#.a: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT); Sistema Regional de Información en Línea para Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal (Latindex); Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); SCOPUS

561.#.#.u: http://www.psicologia.unam.mx/

650.#.4.x: Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud

336.#.#.b: article

336.#.#.3: Artículo de Investigación

336.#.#.a: Artículo

351.#.#.6: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

351.#.#.b: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

351.#.#.a: Artículos

harvesting_group: RevistasUNAM

270.1.#.p: Revistas UNAM. Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial, UNAM en revistas@unam.mx

590.#.#.c: Open Journal Systems (OJS)

270.#.#.d: MX

270.1.#.d: México

590.#.#.b: Concentrador

883.#.#.u: https://revistas.unam.mx/catalogo/

883.#.#.a: Revistas UNAM

590.#.#.a: Coordinación de Difusión Cultural

883.#.#.1: https://www.publicaciones.unam.mx/

883.#.#.q: Dirección General de Publicaciones y Fomento Editorial

850.#.#.a: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

856.4.0.u: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/56785/50360

100.1.#.a: Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Laurenti, Carolina

524.#.#.a: Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima, et al. (2016). A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111616

245.1.0.a: A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH

502.#.#.c: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

561.1.#.a: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM

264.#.0.c: 2016

264.#.1.c: 2016-06-01

506.1.#.a: La titularidad de los derechos patrimoniales de esta obra pertenece a las instituciones editoras. Su uso se rige por una licencia Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Internacional, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es, para un uso diferente consultar al responsable jurídico del repositorio por medio del correo electrónico editor_general@rmac-mx.org

884.#.#.k: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/article/view/56785

001.#.#.#: 109.oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/56785

041.#.7.h: eng

520.3.#.a: Radical behaviorism is often said to be inspired by pragmatism. Similarities between these two philosophies generally center on epistemological issues. For instance, the pragmatic theory of truth as effectiveness would be shared by behavior analysts. But because pragmatism is a philosophy built precisely by the gathering of components derived from previously existing philosophical traditions, it cannot be reduced to just one of these components alone without running the risk of mischaracterization. Is the idea of truth as effectiveness the only common ground between pragmatism and behavior analysis? In this review, divided in two parts, we argue for a negative answer, exploring on one hand, different dimensions of the pragmatic theory of truth, and on the other hand, world views underlying these two philosophies. In this first part, we note that the criterion of effectiveness is not the sole pragmatic criterion of truth. The criterion of coherence, along with the role of beliefs addressed in pragmatic theory, are fundamental to a thorough understanding of pragmatic theory of truth, with relevant consequences to evaluate the relations between pragmatism and behavior analysis.

773.1.#.t: Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2016)

773.1.#.o: https://www.revistas.unam.mx/index.php/rmac/index

022.#.#.a: ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

310.#.#.a: Cuatrimestral

300.#.#.a: Páginas: 87-104

264.#.1.b: Facultad de Psicología, UNAM; Sociedad Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta

doi: https://doi.org/10.5514/rmac.v42.i1.56785

handle: 64f71c86e37e5c74

harvesting_date: 2023-08-23 17:00:00.0

856.#.0.q: application/pdf

file_creation_date: 2016-07-28 17:44:31.0

file_modification_date: 2016-07-28 17:44:34.0

file_name: f498bcae842e244f8d2be00f2e07bd7eee1a47e08fde39d3a344a46316754de9.pdf

file_pages_number: 18

file_format_version: application/pdf; version=1.4

file_size: 192036

245.1.0.b: A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH

last_modified: 2023-08-23 17:00:00

license_url: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode.es

license_type: by-nc-nd

No entro en nada

No entro en nada 2

Artículo

A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH

Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Laurenti, Carolina

Facultad de Psicología, UNAM, publicado en Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, y cosechado de Revistas UNAM

Licencia de uso

Procedencia del contenido

Cita

Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima, et al. (2016). A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 . Recuperado de https://repositorio.unam.mx/contenidos/4111616

Descripción del recurso

Autor(es)
Freitas Carneiro Leão, Monalisa De Fátima; Alves Da Rocha, César Antonio; Laurenti, Carolina
Tipo
Artículo de Investigación
Área del conocimiento
Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud
Título
A REASSESSMENT OF PRAGMATISM IN BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS: I. THE THEORY OF TRUTH
Fecha
2016-06-01
Resumen
Radical behaviorism is often said to be inspired by pragmatism. Similarities between these two philosophies generally center on epistemological issues. For instance, the pragmatic theory of truth as effectiveness would be shared by behavior analysts. But because pragmatism is a philosophy built precisely by the gathering of components derived from previously existing philosophical traditions, it cannot be reduced to just one of these components alone without running the risk of mischaracterization. Is the idea of truth as effectiveness the only common ground between pragmatism and behavior analysis? In this review, divided in two parts, we argue for a negative answer, exploring on one hand, different dimensions of the pragmatic theory of truth, and on the other hand, world views underlying these two philosophies. In this first part, we note that the criterion of effectiveness is not the sole pragmatic criterion of truth. The criterion of coherence, along with the role of beliefs addressed in pragmatic theory, are fundamental to a thorough understanding of pragmatic theory of truth, with relevant consequences to evaluate the relations between pragmatism and behavior analysis.
Idioma
eng
ISSN
ISSN: 0185-4534; ISSN electrónico: 2007-0802

Enlaces